Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization
Edmonton Korean Antioch Presbyterian Church
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOVE CORPS ALBERTA | C$7,458 |
| EDMONTON URBAN NATIVE MISSION | C$5,456 |
| WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS | C$3,666 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EUEDMONTON URBAN NATIVE MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · C$82k · revenue +114%
- WBWycliffe Bible Translators8× · 2017–2024 · C$52k · revenue +23%
- MBMY BELOVED CHURCH5× · 2018–2022 · C$5k · revenue +319%
Funded once
- TPThe Presbyterian of Western Han-Caone grant, 2017 · C$9k
- HPHanmaum Presbyterian Churchone grant, 2018 · C$2k
- HPHanmaum Presbyterian Churchone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Worship sunday school and spreading the god's messages to people in the great vancouver area
Sunday worship services children's sunday school bible study youth bible study and prayer meetings
Regular Christians worship services on Sunday and other days.
Every Sunday Service Community Gatherings Festival Celebrations Prayers Sunday School for Kids
Sunday worship sunday schools choir prayer meetings bible studies missions and fellowships
Worship bible and prayer meeting
Sunday worship service wednesday worship service and bible study saturdday early morning worship service
We operate a local church where people can worship God. We hold weekly Sunday worship service. Also we hold weekly Sunday School for Kids. We provide pastoral care (that is counseling and meeting spiritual needs)
Sunday worship service; sunday school; group fellowship; prayer meeting; bible study and children sunday school.
Worship to the god and evangelism of gospel to japanese canadian and others.
Weekly worship services community outreach and bible study sunday school & religious fellowship
Sunday Worship Bible Study
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nanaimo Native Victory Chapel and the most unlike its peers is The Trustee Board of the Presbyterian Church in Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOVE CORPS ALBERTA ↗
- Who funds EDMONTON URBAN NATIVE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Wycliffe Bible Translators ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds SEED INTERNATIONAL MISSION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Sung-An Presbyterian Church ↗
- Who funds MY BELOVED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds VANCOUVER JESUS AGAPE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Hanmaum Presbyterian Church ↗
- Who funds NANAIMO NATIVE VICTORY CHAPEL ↗
- Who funds Compassion Canada ↗
- Who funds GRACE NATIVE MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coram Deo Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.