Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Wood Family Foundation / Fondation Famille Wood

Dons à diverses organisations charitatives

C$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$12k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$30k
C$10,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$701k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABBAYE DE SAINT-BENOÎT-DU-LACC$10,000
LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINT-PATRICEC$10,000
BISHOP'S UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONC$10,000
PRO ACTIONS COPS & KIDSC$5,000
ORFORD MUSIQUEC$5,000
FONDATION CONSTANCE LANGLOIS INC.C$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$209k · 10 repeat orgsC$76k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

C$209k
C$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+15%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FONDATION LISE WATIER
    3× · 2019–2022 · C$40k · revenue +73%
  • PA
    PRO ACTIONS COPS & KIDS
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$27k · revenue +81%
  • TH
    THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$25k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue -4%
  • OS
    ORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE SHERBROOKE
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +14%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'ATAXIE CHARLEVOIX-SAGUENAY
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation Philippe Laprise
—
2
La Fondation Santé
—
3
Fondation de l'Orchestre Symphonique de Québec

Récompenser et encourager l'excellence la créativité et la détermination des artistes de la génération montante. dons à l'orchestre symphonique de québec

—
4
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
5
Fondation le Piolet
—
6
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
7
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
8
Fondation Lajemmerais
—
9
Fondation Edouard Et Ses Etoiles
—
10
Fondation Maxime-Letendre
—
11
Fondation: Ecole Saint-Etienne
—
12
Fondation Alain Lemaire
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oeuvre charitable des Chevaliers de Colomb du Québec Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Stanstead Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION LISE WATIER — C$40,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBISHOP'S UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — C$30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRO ACTIONS COPS & KIDS — C$27,333 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION PORTAGE — C$21,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLA FABRIQUE DE LA PRAOISSE DE SAINT-PATRICE — C$20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetORFORD MUSIQUE — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION AMIS ÉCOLE PRINCESS ELIZABETH — C$13,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetFONDATION CONSTANCE LANGLOIS INC — C$10,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE SHERBROOKE — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetABBAYE DE SAINT-BENOÎT-DU-LAC — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ATAXIE CHARLEVOIX-SAGUENAY — C$9,566 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMITÉ DES OEUVRES CHARITABLES DU CONSEIL MAGOG — C$7,800 over 2y, 13% of budgetACCUEIL NOTRE DAME — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE MONTREAL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMISSION SCOLAIRE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHELPS HELPS — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFONDATION DES MALADIES MENTALES — C$4,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVILLA PIERROT — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ HISTORIQUE DE STANDSTEAD — C$3,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHEVALIERS DE COLOMB — C$2,690 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSÉE INTERNATIONAL D'ART NAIF DE MAGOG — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…The Bannerman Foundat…The Libermont Foundat…R. Howard Webster Fou…La Fondation du Grand…Wcpd FoundationFondation Sibylla Hes…Fondation Henrichon-G…Fondation Huguette et…Fondation Sandra et A…Fondation de la famil…Fondation Philantra P…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC11.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · The Bannerman Foundation · The Libermont Foundation/La Fondation Libermont · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Wcpd Foundation · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation Henrichon-Goulet · Fondation Huguette et Jean-Louis-Fontaine · Fondation Sandra et Alain Bouchard · Fondation de la famille Zeller · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 867661803:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Wood Family Foundation / Fondation Famille Wood’s filings →