Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

The Bannerman Foundation

The foundation has concentrated on the contributions to ongoing research programs.

C$283k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$77k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$28k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$115k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$140k
C$7,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
L'ASSOCIATION DU MARAIS DE LA RIVIÈRE AUX CERISES (LAMRAC)C$77,000
ABBAYE SAINT-BENOIT-DU-LACC$62,500
ORFORD MUSIQUEC$25,000
FONDATION DU CHUSC$25,000
MASSAWIPPI VALLE FOUNDATIONC$22,000
MAISON DU PARCC$12,000
LE TANDEMC$11,000
PHELPS HELPC$10,000
VILLA PIERROTC$10,000
ASSOCIATION COMMUNAUTAIRE DE GEORGEVILLEC$7,000
LA MAISON AUBE-LUMIEREC$5,000
MEMPHREMAGOG CONSERVATION INC.C$5,000
ALZHEIMER GROUP INC.C$5,000
STANSTEAD HISTORICAL SOCIETYC$2,000
SOUPER DU PARTAGE JEAN PELCHATC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.3M · 32 repeat orgsC$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
8

Total granted

C$2.3M
C$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+4%

Still filing today

94%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    ROYAL INSTITUTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$610k · revenue +41%
  • LD
    L'ASSOCIATION DU MARAIS DE LA RIVIÈRE AUX CERISES (LAMRAC)
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$152k · revenue +24%
  • VP
    VILLA PERROT
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$132k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k
  • AN
    ACCUEIL NOTRE DAME
    one grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue -2%
  • MM
    MAB MACKAY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—
2
Fondation du Manoir St-Eustache

Collecte de fonds pour promouvoir l'exellence des soins à la collectivité et la qualité de vie au centre d'hébergement de saint-eustache au centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des laurentides par l'acquisition de nouveaux…

—
3
La Fondation Santé
—
4
Fondation 'La Maison Notre-Dame Du Saguenay'

Contribuer au développement des activités médicales de même qu'à la promotion de la recherche sous toutes ses formes dans la région du saguenay

—
5
Fondation de l'hôpital d'Argenteuil

Recevoir des dons ou legs pour les fins particulières du cmsss d'argenteuil dans le but d'aider d'établissement dans la réalisation de sa mission - organiser des campagnes de souscription et solliciter des dons en faveur du cmsss…

—
6
Fondation du Manoir Mauvide-Genest

La société voit à la mise en valeur au développement à l'exploitation et à la promotion du manoir mauvide-genest une immeuble classé bien patrimonial et reconnu d'intérêt national. le manoir mauvide-genest présente un intérêt patrimonial…

—
7
Fondation Sauvegarde ÉGlise Historique De Saint-Eustache

Assurer la dérennité de l'église comme trésor architectural historique et culturel. assurer la restauration de bâtiment et la mise en valeur du site

—
8
Fondation Tremplin Santé

L'organisme a pour but de soutenir le développement d'environnements sécuritaires et favorables à l'adoption de saines habitudes de vie en contexte de loisir. soutenir l'accessibilité des jeunes de milieux financièrement défavorisés à des…

—
9
Fondation santé et mieux-être Jeanne-Mance

La fondation a pour but de recueillir des fonds destinés à la communauté, à la recherche ainsi qu'à l'amélioration du milieu de vie de la clientèle des centres d'hébergements du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud de l'Ile-de-Montréal.

—
10
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
11
Fondation des résidences Mance-Décary

La fondation un organisme sans but lucratif a été constituée le 3 janvier 1997 en vertu de la partie iii de la loi sur les compagnies du québec et est un organisme de bienfaisance au sens de la loi de l'impôt sur le revenu. le but…

—
12
Fondation de L'Hopital Marie-Clarac

Améliorer la qualité des soins et des services offerts aux bénéficiaires de l'hôpital marie-clarac en effectuant des dons.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'hopital De Memphremagog / Memphremagog Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Stanstead Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
29/38
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROYAL INSTITUTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING — C$610,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOXFORD MUSIQUE — C$267,912 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetDR. W. J. KLINCK FOUNDATION — C$154,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetL'ASSOCIATION DU MARAIS DE LA RIVIÈRE AUX CERISES (LAMRAC) — C$152,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetMASSAWIPPI VALEE FOUNDATION — C$141,500 over 8y, 30% of budgetVILLA PERROT — C$132,348 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetABBAYE SAINT-BENOIT-DU-LAC — C$125,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget[JE;[S JE;[S — C$105,412 over 8y, 21% of budgetMAISON DU PARC — C$104,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetLAMRAC — C$88,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetFONDATION DU CHUS — C$75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMILE END LEGAL — C$65,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetMAB-MACKAY FOUNDATION — C$55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGEORGESVILLE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — C$46,900 over 8y, 20% of budgetLA MAISON AUBE-LUMIERR — C$40,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMEMPHREMAGOG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$37,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMEMPHREMAGOG CONSERVATION INC — C$25,252 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetSTANDSTEAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY — C$24,573 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetROZYNSKI CENTRE FOR FINE ARTS — C$21,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetALZHEIMER GROUPS INC. — C$19,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetACCUEIL NOTRE DAME — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HASKELL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — C$8,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetSUN YOUTH — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWELCOME HALL MISSION — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PEES — C$6,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetQUEBEC LODGE FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFOUNDATION CHRISTIAN VACHON — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLE PHARE, ENFANTS ET FAMILLES — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MACPHERSON CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — C$2,600 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetLA FONDATION JOOIA — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSENTIER MASSAWIPI — C$1,800 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSOUPER DU PARTAGE JEAN PELCHAT — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCANADA'S HISTORY SOCIETY — C$1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGEVILLE HISTORIAL SOCIETY — C$1,120 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFOUNDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUCAN MONTEREGIE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST. PAUL'S UNITED CHURCH — C$300 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

R. Howard Webster Fou…Fondation de la famil…Jewish Community Foun…Fondation J Armand Bo…Wood Family Foundatio…Philip & Judith Webst…Fondation Huguette et…Le Comptoir Familial …Fondation Denise Et G…The Libermont Foundat…Howick Foundation /Fo…The Foundation Office…
R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard WebsterQC13.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · Fondation de la famille Zeller · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Wood Family Foundation / Fondation Famille Wood · Philip & Judith Webster Family Foundation · Fondation Huguette et Jean-Louis-Fontaine · Le Comptoir Familial de Magog Inc. · Fondation Denise Et Guy St-Germain · The Libermont Foundation/La Fondation Libermont · Howick Foundation /Fondation Howick · The Foundation Office.Ca

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing education.

Source object 888055647:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bannerman’s filings →