Regina, SK · Charitable organization
Witness to All Nations Inc.
Advancement of religion; a)communicating the gospel by travelling and preaching to europe africa cuba central america middle east asia and across canada; b) organizing concerts and city wide praise as fund raisers for charitable programs to feed the poor adancement of educatio; wtan has established a christian training…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGHTHOUSE TO ALL NATIONS CHURCH INC | C$650 |
| MUSIC FOR LIFE | C$600 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LTLIGHTHOUSE TO ALL NATIONS CHURCH INC7× · 2017–2024 · C$27k · revenue -14%
- MFMUSIC FOR LIFE6× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue -41%
- GTGLAD TIDINGS MINISTRY2× · 2020–2023 · C$670 · revenue +154%
Funded once
- HMHARVEST MINISTRY INTERNATIONALone grant, 2019 · C$5k
- DCDOMINION CHAPEL MINISTRYone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +22%
- MFMUSIC FOR LIFEone grant, 2019 · C$600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Weekly worship services online weekly ministries in group settings training and discipline sunday school for adults and chldren weekly praying meetings
To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.
Teaching Services Kingdom Advancing Prayer Meetings Bible Study Worship Services Counselling Services
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Church services programs television ministry (living truth) and global missions
Bible studies prayer meetings
Conduct gospel outreaches provide study materials for educational discipleship prayer and bible teaching
Provides counselling services retreats workshops consultation podcasting personal mentoring and christian faith formation.
Evangelical ministry
Religious teachings in various locales prayer ministry
Preaching and bible study - telephone prayer meeting and evangelism
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse to All Nations Church Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Music for Life Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE TO ALL NATIONS CHURCH INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds DOMINION CHAPEL MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds GLAD TIDINGS MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds HOME CHURCH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds V-KOL MEDIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LIFESTREAM MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds LINKING HEARTS INC. ↗
- Who funds KAIO MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lighthouse to All Nations Church Inc. · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.