Regina, SK · Charitable organization
Lighthouse to All Nations Church Inc.
Weekly worship services ministries for men and women prayer services pastoral care social outreach programs longterm and shorter term missions equipping and training for ministries.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$10k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOSPEL FIRE FOR ALL NATIONS | C$11,305 |
| GLAD TIDINGS MINISTRIES | C$8,746 |
| MORNING STAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | C$600 |
| WITNESS TO ALL NATIONS INC. | C$500 |
| LIFESTREAM MINISTRIES | C$390 |
| V-KOL MEDIA MINISTRIES | C$100 |
| LINKING HEARTS INC. | C$50 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$12k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- WTWITNESS TO ALL NATIONS INC5× · 2017–2024 · C$70k · revenue -61%
- GTGLAD TIDINGS MINISTRIES6× · 2018–2024 · C$50k · revenue -21% · 92% of their budget
- MAMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA2× · 2017–2021 · C$6k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- GTGLAD TIDINGS MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · C$11k
- SWSEVEN WELLS MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · C$3k
- AIAGLOW INTERNATIONAL CANADAone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.
Weekly worship services online weekly ministries in group settings training and discipline sunday school for adults and chldren weekly praying meetings
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Preaching and bible study - telephone prayer meeting and evangelism
Bible studies prayer meetings
Youth conferences Worship services Leadership and Evangelism.
Teaching Services Kingdom Advancing Prayer Meetings Bible Study Worship Services Counselling Services
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
Religious teachings in various locales prayer ministry
Church services programs television ministry (living truth) and global missions
Religious services sunday school for children adult bible studies. missionary outreach prayer services and spiritual counselling
Evangelical ministry
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Glad Tidings Evangelistic Association Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Trossachs Camp Meeting Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WITNESS TO ALL NATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds GLAD TIDINGS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL FIRE FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
- Who funds MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds MORNING STAR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds AGLOW INTERNATIONAL CANADA ↗
- Who funds V-KOL MEDIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATION CHURCH ↗
- Who funds TROSSACHS CAMP MEETING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEVEN WELLS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FREE TO CARE SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds SONLIGHT CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LIFESTREAM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds RIVER HOUSE OF PRAYER ↗
- Who funds EL ELYON ON EAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN CTR ↗
- Who funds LINKING HEARTS INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Witness to All Nations Inc. · Harvest City Church Inc. · C&J Ekong Charitable Foundation Inc. · Canadian National Christian Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.