Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

William F Hayball Charitable Foundation

To receive/maintain a fund and to apply it and related income to charitable purposes in the region of durham

C$811k
Granted FY2019
28
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under C$10k24 grants · C$36k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$25k
  • C$250k+3 grants · C$750k
C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$90k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKERIDGE HEALTH FDNC$250,000
GRANDVIEW CHILDRENS FDNC$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INST OF TECHNOLOGYC$250,000
DURHAM COLLEGE FDNC$25,000
SIMCOE HALL SETTLEMENT HOUSEC$2,500
LAKERIDGE HEALTH FOUNDATION (WOMEN'S RESIDENTC$2,500
ALZHEIMER SOCIETY DURHAMC$2,000
RENASCENT FOUNDATION INCC$2,000
ST VINCENT PALLOTTIS KITCHEN DURHAM OUTLOOKC$2,000
GRANDVIEW CHILDRENS FOUNDATIONC$2,000
ROSE OF DURHAMC$2,000
GATE 316 OUTREACH CENTREC$2,000
DURHAM DEAF SERVICESC$2,000
DURHAM FAMILY COURT CLINICC$2,000
DENISE HOUSEC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$604k · 22 repeat orgsC$281k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

C$604k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+201%

Still filing today

95%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$277k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LAKERIDGE HEALTH FDN
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$258k · revenue +59%
  • GC
    GRANDVIEW CHILDRENS FDN
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$257k · revenue +34%
  • SH
    Simcoe Hall Settlement House
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$8k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • DD
    Durham Deaf Services
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k
  • DY
    Durham Youth Housing Joannes Housegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +201%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Durham Mental Health Services

Durham mental health services provides a range of services to people with serious long standing mental health difficulties. programs include: four residential support houses a case management program community based crisis services court…

—
2
Durham Mental Health Services Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and other property and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time for the benefit of durham mental health services. durham mental health services provides a range of…

—
3
Durham Alliance Outreach

Mental health care

—
4
Durham Region Critical Incident Stress Support Team

Supply emotional support services to emergency responders in time of crisis teach pre-incident prevention to mitigate effects of trauma

—
5
Durham Down's Syndrome Association

Provided resources and held various events for those with and affected by down syndrome

—
6
North House

North house provides a wide range of housing and support programs for those who are at risk or in crisis within the communitied or north durham. the programs are aimed at helping low income families and individuals in need of subsidized…

—
7
Simcoe Hall Women's League Foundation

Investment activities and gifts to qualified donees in durham region

—
8
Brain Injury Association of Durham Region

The following programs are offered to support individuals caregivers and family of those affected by brain injury: - Adult Day Program - Dementia Strategy - Supported Independent Living Program - Community Support Program - Information…

—
9
Resources for Exceptional Children - Durham Region

Resources for exceptional children and youth – durham region will assist the family to enhance their child’s participation in their community and support the family to advocate for services that they require. resources for exceptional…

—
10
The Distress Centre of Durham Region Oshawa
—
11
The Durham College of Applied Arts and Technology
—
12
For the Love of a Child

Fundraising for the purpose of providing financial assistance to families living in the durham region and incurring extraordinary costs associated with raising a child with special needs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bereaved Families of Ontario Durham Region and the most unlike its peers is The Oshawa Sports Hall of Fame Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAKERIDGE HEALTH FDN — C$257,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetGRANDVIEW CHILDRENS FDN — C$257,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INST OF TECHNOLOGY — C$250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDURHAM COLLEGE FDN — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSimcoe Hall Settlement House — C$7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGate 316 Outreach Centre — C$7,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetRose of Durham — C$7,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDenise House — C$7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRenascent Foundation Inc — C$7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDurham Outlook Vincent Palottis Kitchen — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDURHAM FAMILY COURT CLINIC — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY DURHAM — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way Durham Region — C$4,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDURHAM DEAF SERVICES — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEpilipsy Durham Region — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAUTISM DURHAM — C$3,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOntario Tucking Assn Education Fdn — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budget'...' CHILDRENS CHARITY — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOntario Philharmonic — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOshawa Sports Hall of Fame — C$3,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHearth Place Cancer Support Centre — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLukes Place — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOakridges Hospice of Durham — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEREAVED FAMILIES OF ONTARIO DURHAM — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDURHAM REGIONAL CRIME STOPPERS INC — C$1,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetDurham Youth Housing Joannes House — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Durham Community Foun…Ontario Power Generat…United Way of Durham …Deer Creek Cares Char…Herman Kassinger Foun…Pickering Rotary Club…Ajax Pickering Hospit…Oshawa Parkwood Rotar…St. Joseph's Council …Youth and Philanthrop…Faith United ChurchArbor Memorial Founda…
Durham Community FoundationON25.4× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Durham Community Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · United Way of Durham Region · Deer Creek Cares Charitable Foundation · Herman Kassinger Foundation · Pickering Rotary Club Charitable Trust · Ajax Pickering Hospital Foundation · Oshawa Parkwood Rotary Club Charitable Foundation · St. Joseph's Council No. 6361 Charitable Welfare Trust · Youth and Philanthropy Initiative Canada/ Initiative Canada Jeunesse Et Philanthropie · Faith United Church · Arbor Memorial Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2021) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119298453:2019-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on William F Hayball’s filings →