Skip to content

Courtice, ON · Charitable organization

Faith United Church

Adult programs offered in hybrid format (in person and online): worship spiritual development health and wellness LGBTQ2S+ activities Indigenous studies environmental activities Child and family programs such as Tots on Tuesday Family Fun Night Community programs: community garden financial supports to social service agencies…

C$59k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$29k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k18 grants · C$30k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$29k
C$1,150
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Church of Canada Mission & ServiceC$29,232
LifewaterC$5,918
Lakeridge Health FoundationC$4,050
Gate 3:16C$2,186
Simcoe Hall Settlement HouseC$1,781
Back Door Mission for Relief of PovertyC$1,770
Luke's Place Support & Resource Centre for Women & ChildrenC$1,750
AIDS Committee of Durham RegionC$1,300
The Denise House / Sedna Women's Shelter & Support ServicesC$1,250
Bethesda HouseC$1,150
Frontenac Youth ServicesC$1,100
The Participation House Project (Durham Region)C$1,100
Durham Youth Services (Joanne's House)C$1,050
Footprints 4 AutismC$1,050
Durham Children's Aid FoundationC$1,050
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 87% of grant dollars (C$248k). The 13% that went abroad (C$36k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 13% of all-years giving (C$36k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$154k · 29 repeat orgsC$130k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
53

Total granted

C$154k
C$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
-5%

Still filing today

41%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada Mission & Service
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$57k · revenue +28%
  • LH
    Lakeridge Health Foundation
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$5k · revenue +104%
  • G3
    Gate 3:16
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$4k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • MA
    Mission and Service Fund (United Church of Canada)
    one grant, 2017 · C$32k
  • MA
    Mission and Service Fund (United Church of CanadaO
    one grant, 2023 · C$29k
  • WP
    World Primate Relief Fund-Pikangikum Water Project
    one grant, 2017 · C$8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Durham Mental Health Services

Durham mental health services provides a range of services to people with serious long standing mental health difficulties. programs include: four residential support houses a case management program community based crisis services court…

—
2
North House

North house provides a wide range of housing and support programs for those who are at risk or in crisis within the communitied or north durham. the programs are aimed at helping low income families and individuals in need of subsidized…

—
3
Durham Alliance Outreach

Mental health care

—
4
Canadian Mental Health Association Durham Branch

The organization is a multi-service agency and provides community based mental health programs and services to persons with mental health problems and illnesses as such: - place individuals into appropriate housing and provide ongoing…

—
5
Durham Mental Health Services Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and other property and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time for the benefit of durham mental health services. durham mental health services provides a range of…

—
6
Cornerstone Community Association Durham Inc.

The shelter program provides emergency shelter to men aged 16 and above who are currently homeless. transitional housing supports individuals on a rent-geared-to-income (rgi) basis beginning with the transition toward greater independent…

—
7
Durham and District Foodbank

Relief of poverty providing food security to low income individuals and families

—
8
John Howard Society of Durham Region

Counselling;employment program;youth services;literacy/upgrading;residence program access to affordable housing; d.a.d.a. of durham;anger management;addictions-project x; criminal record-pardon application;presentations;parenting;diversion…

—
9
Feed the Need in Durham

Feed the need in durham strives to improve the collection and distribution of food and basic needs donations to the emergency food providers in the durham region. feed the need also has an on-site food bank managed and operated by the feed…

—
10
Pregnancy Help Centre of Durham

The pregnancy help centre of durham provides support and education to young families in distress dure to pregnancy. we provide prenatal information and provide ongoing support for those who find themselves pregnant and choose to carry to…

—
11
Victim Services of Durham Region

Provide a home or hostel with educational facilities for the reception care and education of abubused women and children. Provide education and counselling and assist abused women and children to improve by change or otherwise their home…

—
12
Durham Children's Aid Society

Mandatory child welfare

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Back Door Mission for the Relief of Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Simcoe Hall Settlement House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada Mission & Service — C$57,236 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPWRDF — C$6,465 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLifewater — C$5,918 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLakeridge Health Foundation — C$5,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGate 3:16 — C$3,686 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSimcoe Hall Settlement House — C$3,216 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAIDS Committee of Durham Region — C$2,575 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLuke's Place Support & Resource Centre for Women & Children — C$2,525 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Denise House / Sedna Women's Shelter & Support Services — C$2,425 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBethesda House — C$2,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Participation House Project (Durham Region) — C$1,975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFootprints 4 Autism — C$1,825 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDurham Youth Services (Joanne's House) — C$1,825 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Refuge Youth Outreach Centre — C$1,775 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBack Door Mission for Relief of Poverty — C$1,770 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFrontenac Youth Services — C$1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDurham Children's Aid Foundation — C$1,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Durham — C$1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarigold Hospice Care - Durham Hospice — C$800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDurham Outlook for the Needy — C$450 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church of Canada Mission & Service ↗
  • Who funds PWRDF ↗
  • Who funds Lifewater ↗
  • Who funds Lakeridge Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Gate 3:16 ↗
  • Who funds Simcoe Hall Settlement House ↗
  • Who funds AIDS Committee of Durham Region ↗
  • Who funds Luke's Place Support & Resource Centre for Women & Children ↗
  • Who funds The Denise House / Sedna Women's Shelter & Support Services ↗
  • Who funds Bethesda House ↗
  • Who funds The Participation House Project (Durham Region) ↗
  • Who funds Footprints 4 Autism ↗
  • Who funds Durham Youth Services (Joanne's House) ↗
  • Who funds The Refuge Youth Outreach Centre ↗
  • Who funds Back Door Mission for Relief of Poverty ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Durham RegionON21.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Durham Region · Durham Community Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Herman Kassinger Foundation · Deer Creek Cares Charitable Foundation · Pickering Rotary Club Charitable Trust · William F Hayball Charitable Foundation · Whitby Christian Assembly · Oshawa Parkwood Rotary Club Charitable Foundation · Youth and Philanthropy Initiative Canada/ Initiative Canada Jeunesse Et Philanthropie · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Christ Memorial Church

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 132147133:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Faith United Church’s filings →