Skip to content

Saskatoon, SK · Private foundation

Tom McLellan Family Foundation Inc

C$69k
Granted FY2018
17
Grants FY2018
—
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under C$10k15 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$60k
C$100
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$428k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St. Augustine ParishC$34,550
Sherbrooke FoundationC$25,000
Friends of the Bowl FoundationC$7,500
Saskatoon City Hospital FoundationC$500
Friendship InnC$250
Doctors Without BordersC$200
Covenant HouseC$200
Cystic FibrosisC$100
Cdn Red CrossC$100
Saskatchewan Blind SportsC$100
MS SocietyC$100
Lung Association of SaskatchewanC$100
Kidney FoundationC$100
Heart and Stroke Foundation of SaskatchewanC$100
Ducks UnlimitedC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$129k · 14 repeat orgsC$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

C$129k
C$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+21%

Still filing today

71%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Sherbrooke Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$75k · revenue +275%
  • SA
    Saskatchewan Abilities Council
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$800 · revenue +28%
  • SF
    Saskatchewan Friendship Inn
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$650 · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • DO
    Diocese of Saskatoon Catholic Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$57k · revenue +16%
  • NH
    New Hope Dog Rescue
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +5%
  • UO
    University of Saskatchewan
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
2
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
3
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
4
Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc.

The foundation obtained it’s registered charity status on may 14 2018. the foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the cancer needs of the people of saskatchewan. as the fundraising partner for the saskatchewan cancer agency the…

—
5
Saskatchewan Stock Growers Foundation Inc.

To protect and preserve the environment enhance and restore natural ecosystem and wildlife habitat and to preserve indigeneous species of flora and fauna in Saskatchewan by acquiring conservations easements.

—
6
United Way of Saskatoon and Area

United Way mission is to improve lives and build community by engaging individuals and mobilizing collective action. United Way invests resources into programs services and community building activities that have an emphasis on addressing…

—
7
Saskatoon Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc.

The organization is dedicated to helping build a compassionate community where every animal is respected and protected by providing sheltering adoption services and lifesaving care to meet the immediate needs of at risk animals while…

—
8
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—
9
Saskatoon Zoo Foundation Inc.

The charity is engaged in the business of promoting and facilitating the development of the saskatoon forestry farm park and zoo by raising funds through donations for capital projects.

—
10
Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation

Habitat Trust - a special fund established in 1978 for the purchase retention and enhancement of critical wildlife habitat across SK Wildlife Tomorrow - private stewardship program where individual landowners set aside a small parcel of…

—
11
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
12
Saskatchewan Indigenous Community Foundation
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saskatchewan Abilities Council Inc. and the most unlike its peers is New Hope Dog Rescue Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSherbrooke Foundation — C$75,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetDiocese of Saskatoon Catholic Foundation — C$57,250 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFriends of the Bowl Foundation — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hope Dog Rescue — C$3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Saskatchewan — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNature Saskatchewan — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSaskatchewan Abilities Council — C$800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatchewan Friendship Inn — C$650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatoon City Hospital Foundation — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSask. Cancer Agency — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope For Malawi Fdn. Inc — C$500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCovenant House — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Kids Canada — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCystic Fibrosis — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSWITCH — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanadian Wildlife Federation — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKidney Foundation — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCdn Red Cross — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatchewan Blind Sports — C$200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDoctors Without Borders — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Saskatoon Catholic Schools Foundation — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLions Foundation of Canada — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWar Amps — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Feed the Children — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saskatoon Community FoundationSK15.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saskatoon Community Foundation · United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Leslie & Irene Dube Foundation Inc. · United Way of Regina · Our Lady of the Prairies Foundation · Episcopal Corporation of Saskatoon · Lily Street Foundation · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · Grk Family Foundation Inc. · Joseph Alfred Remai Family Foundation Inc. · The Murray and Audrey Neufeld Charitable Foundation Inc. · Outlook Donors Choice

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation.

Source object 119244770:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Tom McLellan Family’s filings →