Skip to content
Canadian charities

Saskatoon, SK · Private foundation

Joseph Alfred Remai Family Foundation Inc.

Contributions to registered charities

C$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$3.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$3.4M
C$10,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SASKATCHEWAN POLYTECHC$3,400,000
TENNIS CANADAC$10,000
SASKATOON RESTORATIVE ACTION PROGRAM INC.C$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14M · 19 repeat orgsC$953k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

C$14M
C$953k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+30%

Still filing today

89%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SASKATCHEWAN POLYTECH
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$10M · revenue +43%
  • RF
    RUH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1.5M · revenue +95%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$1.0M · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$500k · revenue +30%
  • RM
    REMAI MODERN ART GALLERY
    one grant, 2017 · C$350k
  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$75k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
2
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
3
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
4
Saskatoon Student Wellness Initiative Toward Community Health Inc.

The mission of the organization is to establish and maintain a student driven interdisciplinary health centre to provide integrated and timely health care services to saskatoon's core neighbourhoods

—
5
Saskatchewan Indigenous Community Foundation
—
6
Saskatchewan Safety Council

Saskatchewan Safety Council provides quality up to date safety education programming in Saskatchewan. Thousands of participants were given injury prevention training in over 80 different programs focusing on youth seniors industries and…

—
7
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
8
Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce Foundation
—
9
Saskatchewan Heart Centre Inc.
—
10
Saskatoon Community Foundation

PROVIDE GRANTS TO QUALIFIED DONEES COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP PROGRAMS PROVIDE STUDENT AWARDS Promote Legacy Giving and Charitable Giving Administer charitable granting programs of Corporates

—
11
Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technologies

Saskatchewan indian institute of technologies is a post-secondary educational institute with an emphasis on the training education and employment development of first nations adults. programming is provided in the areas of academic…

—
12
The Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technologies FoundationInc.
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Saskatoon and Area and the most unlike its peers is Columbus Bosco Homes a Society for Children and Adolescents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSASKATCHEWAN POLYTECH — C$10,000,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetRUH FOUNDATION — C$1,500,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$1,016,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST ANN'S SENIOR CITIZENS VILLAGE — C$650,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetST PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — C$500,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetSASKATOON FOOD BANK & LEARNING CENTRE — C$372,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetCOLUMBUS BOSCO HOMES SASKATOON — C$103,500 over 2y, 30% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE CANADA — C$75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHAD — C$70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP INN — C$27,850 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SASKATOON — C$25,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SASKATOON — C$24,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPAULINE OZDOBA MEMORIAL FUND — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$19,090 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSASKATOON CITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$17,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSASKATOON RESTORATIVE ACTION PROGRAM INC. — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUNICEF CANADA — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAD SASKATOON — C$4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — C$4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSONS CANADA — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR MALAWI FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTATION 20 WEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — C$499 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEEWASIN VALLEY AUTHORITY — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCNIB FOUNDATION — C$75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saskatoon Community F…United Way of Saskato…Bourassa Family Found…Maunders McNeil Found…Episcopal Corporation…Lily Street FoundationPrivate Giving Founda…Sisters of Mission Se…Rowasin Foundation In…Leslie & Irene Dube F…Les Filles de la Prov…Our Lady of the Prair…
Saskatoon Community FoundationSK19.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saskatoon Community Foundation · United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Bourassa Family Foundation Inc · Maunders McNeil Foundation Inc. · Episcopal Corporation of Saskatoon · Lily Street Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Sisters of Mission Service · Rowasin Foundation Inc. · Leslie & Irene Dube Foundation Inc. · Les Filles de la Providence · Our Lady of the Prairies Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 832681530:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Joseph Alfred Remai Family’s filings →