Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Sid and Denise Levin Charitable Foundation

The organization intends to operate as a charitable foundation whose purpose is primarily to make donations to qualified donees.

C$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k18 grants · C$28k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$93k
C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROBBINS HEBREW ACADEMYC$40,006
JA TRUSTC$38,500
NETIVOTC$14,700
NORTHLAND BNAI BRITHC$7,000
DUNBLAINE SCHOOLC$5,400
PROSSERMAN JCCC$3,500
SSCMC$2,300
AGUDAH SOUTHC$2,025
LUBAVITCHC$1,825
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR RIDERS WITH DISABILITIESC$1,210
UPPER CANADA COLLEGEC$1,000
ZICHRON BINYAMINC$834
BETH TZEDECC$650
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIIONC$500
HOLLAND BLOORVIEWC$410
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$351k · 19 repeat orgsC$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

C$351k
C$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$39k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROBBINS HEBREW ACADEMY
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$92k · revenue +43%
  • N
    NETIVOT
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$62k · revenue +37%
  • PJ
    PROSSERMAN JCC
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$19k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • NF
    NEEMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue -30%
  • N
    NETIVOT
    one grant, 2021 · C$19k
  • JY
    JEWISH YOUTH NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · C$4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
3
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
4
Toronto Jewish Academy Ohr Menachem

The charity provides facilities to a related charity that promotes and advances the spiritual teachings of the jewish faith by practicing the religious observances tenets and doctrines associated with the faith. the charity runs programs…

—
5
Talmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust

Operate a school to provide religious education in accordance with orthodox jewish tradition.

—
6
Agudas Tomchei Nachal Novea Charitable Organization

The charity provides scholarships

—
7
The Canadian Jewish Educational Fund

The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.

—
8
Hebrew Academy for Special Children (Canada) Inc.

The purpose of the charity is to assist physically and mentally disabled children from the ages of 3 up to the age of 21 by providing specialized educational and physical programs and theraputic services such as speech language and…

—
9
Bais Chomesh High School for Girls

The Charity operates an orthodox Jewish high school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the Jewish faith as well as general academic studies. The Charity carries on edu- cational programs to provide teachers…

—
10
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
11
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
12
Toronto Bikur Cholim Foundation

The charity has been established to receive and maintain a fund or funds to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom frorm time to time to qualified donees under the income tax act.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chabad Lubavitch of Southern Ontario and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROBBINS HEBREW ACADEMY — C$91,906 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDUNBLAINE SCHOOL — C$89,630 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetNETIVOT — C$61,850 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJA TRUST — C$38,500 over 1y, 43% of budgetNEEMAN FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROSSERMAN JCC — C$19,045 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSSCM — C$15,900 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHLAND BNAI BRITH — C$11,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKALYAS CHILDREN CENTRE — C$10,675 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR RIDERS WITH DISABILITIES — C$8,850 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAGUDAH SOUTH — C$8,115 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLUBAVITCH — C$7,325 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIZRACHI (BNEI AKIVA) — C$6,260 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETH TZEDEC — C$5,735 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER CANADA COLLEGE — C$3,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$2,540 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL WONDERS — C$2,375 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOLLAND BLOORVIEW — C$2,240 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON BINYAMIN — C$1,766 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPETACH TIKVA — C$1,598 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — C$850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE SHUL — C$800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREENA FOUNDATION — C$700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH TORONTO — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TORONTO SOCCER CLUB — C$365 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBNAI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE CANADA — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$160 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Foundation of …United Jewish Appeal …Rayjo Charitable TrustMoral Arc FoundationThe F&R Hauer Charita…My Charity FundMessorah Tzedakah Fou…Philip and Hannah Rei…ORT CanadaThe Benjamin Foundati…The Dr. Wolf Lebovic …The Joseph Lebovic Ch…
Jewish Foundation of Greater TorontoON11.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Moral Arc Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Messorah Tzedakah Foundation · Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation · ORT Canada · The Benjamin Foundation · The Dr. Wolf Lebovic Charitable Foundation · The Joseph Lebovic Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 816472963:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sid and Denise Levin’s filings →