How much did Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation grant in FY2024?

Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation reported 56 grants totaling C$782,894 in its FY2024 T3010 return.

Where is Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation based?

Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation is based in TORONTO, ON.

Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation

Canadian charities Also receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation

Donates to other charitable organizatons religious seminiaries and colleges

C$783k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

Regions reached

C$153k

Largest

01What you fundRead

02Your edgeRead

03Your fieldRead

01What you fund

01FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under C$10k27 grants · C$97k
C$10k–50k26 grants · C$433k
C$50k–250k3 grants · C$253k

C$10,000

Median grant

Regions reached

C$1.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN	C$153,420
NE'EMAN FOUNDATION CANADA	C$50,000
TORONTO CHEDER	C$50,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION	C$49,222
SINAI HEALTH FOUNDATION	C$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO (GOVERNING	C$25,000
FRIENDS OF SIMON WISENTHAL CENTER	C$24,000
YESHIVA GEDOLA MERKAZ HATORAH OF MONT	C$22,000
CDN FRIENDS SEMINARY YESHIVAH MIRER OF	C$20,000
KAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE	C$20,000
BEIS MEIR	C$18,000
AISH HATORAH (VILLAGE SHUL)	C$18,000
KOLLEL TORONTO - INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED	C$18,000
MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION	C$17,500
YESHIVA GEDOLA ZICHRON SHMAYAHU	C$15,500

02Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

C$3.8M · 93 repeat orgsC$330k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

93 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

C$3.8M

C$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%

+16%

Still filing today

84%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$102k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

TC
TORONTO CHEDER
8× · 2017–2024 · C$230k · revenue +73%
JH
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · C$230k · revenue +423%
YY
Yeshivas Yesodei Hatora
7× · 2017–2024 · C$194k · revenue +11%

Funded once

CC
CSRG CDM SERICTU RESEARCH GROUPgraduated
one grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue +390%
MY
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN (REGISTERED OTHER QUA
one grant, 2021 · C$22k
MY
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN (PRESCRIBED UNIVERSITY)
one grant, 2020 · C$20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—

Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—

The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—

Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—

Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—

Canadian Friends of Toldos Aharon

To provide scholarship and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses at yeshiva toldos aharon for the furtherance of religious study

—

Canadian Friends of Yeshivat Wiznitz of Bnei Braq

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at yeshivat wiznitz.

—

Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—

Canadian Friends of Mesivta Torah Temimah

Provide scholarsheps and assistance to deserving students to continue their studies at mesivta torah temimah.

—

Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—

Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Mackenzie Innovation Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

137 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 137 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

123/137

Grantees still filing

88/137

Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The F&R Hauer Charitable FoundationON55.9× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Play a game based on Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family’s filings →