Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Rothschild Charitable Trust

The foundation is intended to operate as a private charitable foundation whose purpose is primarily to make donations in an orderly fashion to qualified donees.

C$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$81k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$12k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$18k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$81k
C$7,750
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$130k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$80,820
CANADIAN FRIEND OF YESHIVAS MIRERC$18,360
YESODEI HATORAC$7,750
SHOAVEI MAYIMC$3,315
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$1,000
THE VILLAGE SHUL AND LEARNING CENTER OF TORONTOC$360
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$303k · 15 repeat orgsC$267k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
16

Total granted

C$303k
C$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+24%

Still filing today

93%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Canadian Friends of Yeshiva Mir
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$51k · revenue +21%
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHOAVEI MAYIM
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +101%
  • KC
    KAYLA'S CHILDREN'S CENTRE
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$14k · revenue ×58

Funded once

  • KS
    KAV SHOLOMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$91k · revenue +35%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    one grant, 2020 · C$29k
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$20k · revenue +423%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
2
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
3
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
4
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
7
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
8
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
9
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
10
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
11
Torah Schools for Israel

To provide scholarships to deserving students to enable them to study the bible and other jewish courses to subsidize bus transportation for needy students to pay for tutors to provide supplemental hours of education and ensure the…

—
12
Abraham Kahn

The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Torah Umesorah Canada and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN FRIEND OF YESHIVAS MIRER — C$156,100 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetKAV SHOLOM — C$91,140 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$80,820 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCanadian Friends of Yeshiva Mir — C$50,960 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBeth Olath Charitable Organization — C$40,165 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$19,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION SHOAVEI MAYIM — C$14,419 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN'S CENTRE — C$13,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTORATH EMETH JEWISH CENTRE — C$12,165 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYESODEI HATORA — C$7,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DANA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$6,995 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$6,175 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHatzolah Toronto — C$5,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL WONDERS — C$2,540 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCARIBOU TORAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH UMESORAH CANADA — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS OF — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHACHNOSAS KALLAH OF TORONTO — C$1,584 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKesher Outreach Organization — C$1,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE VILLAGE SHUL AND LEARNING CENTER OF TORONTO — C$1,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChahad Student Network of Ottawa — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRAJE CANADA — C$530 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetELTZ CHAIM — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALACHIC ACADEMY RAVAD — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrib Canada — C$250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetZAKA FOUNDATION — C$180 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAishel Priority — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Weitz Family Foun…The Rothschild Charit…Abraham Bleeman Found…The S. Sigler Family …Zolty Charitable Foun…Zichron Binyomin Char…Rayjo Charitable TrustThe Dan-Hytman Family…Ari and Naomi Klein C…Abarbanel Eiger Chari…Schofam Charitable Fo…Jack and Doris Bistri…
The Weitz Family FoundationON15.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Weitz Family Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · Abraham Bleeman Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Dan-Hytman Family Foundation · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · Abarbanel Eiger Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 853911857:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rothschild’s filings →