Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Port Perry, ON · Public foundation

The Rotary Club of Port Perry Ontario Charitable Trust

Bursary's for local high schools college and universities donation to rotary international for polio plus program & other programs christmas dinner for over 200 local seniors food bank donations local hospital hospice grandview children's foundation

C$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$56k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$56k
C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKERIDGE HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$56,000
GRANDVIEW CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONC$10,000
ROTARY FOUNDATION (CANADA)C$2,390
TRENT UNIVERSITYC$2,000
DURHAM DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARDC$2,000
NORTH HOUSEC$1,000
ADOPT A VILLAGE IN LAOSC$1,000
CANHELP THROUGH HEALTHCAREC$1,000
OAK RIDGES HOSPICE OF DURHAMC$175
OPERATION DURHAM FOOD BANKC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$303k · 12 repeat orgsC$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

C$303k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OAK RIDGES HOSPICE
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$127k · revenue +718%
  • DC
    DURHAM COLLEGE
    3× · 2019–2023 · C$13k · revenue +20%
  • OS
    OPERATION SCUGOG
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$11k · revenue +223%

Funded once

  • S
    SHELTERBOXES
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue -48%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +88%
  • OT
    ONTARIO TECH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Durham Region

Conducting a fundraising campaign monitoring agencies for which funds are raised and allocation of funds to those agencies.

—
2
Durham Hospital Foundation Inc.

To raise funds and purchase equipment and facilities for the Durham site of the South Bruce Grey Health Care Center and for the medical clinic in Durham.

—
3
Durham Mental Health Services Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and other property and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time for the benefit of durham mental health services. durham mental health services provides a range of…

—
4
Northumberland Hills Hospital Foundation

Improving health care and the quality of life in the community by growing and maintaining donor support for the northumberland hills hospital

—
5
Durham Community Foundation

Dcf fosters philantropy by connecting donors volunteers and community leaders addressing durham’s challenges through research advocacy and collaboration. acting as the voice for charities at multiple levels dcf provides vital support. dfc…

—
6
Simcoe Hall Women's League Foundation

Investment activities and gifts to qualified donees in durham region

—
7
Ignite Durham Learning Foundation

The ignite durham learning foundation is a charitable community organization that serves to remove financial barriers to create equitable opportunities that empower durham district school board students to achieve academic and personal…

—
8
Habitat for Humanity Durham Inc.

Public awareness building and renovation of houses restore fundraising

—
9
Feed the Need in Durham

Feed the need in durham strives to improve the collection and distribution of food and basic needs donations to the emergency food providers in the durham region. feed the need also has an on-site food bank managed and operated by the feed…

—
10
North York General Hospital Foundation

North york general hospital foundation raises and stewards funds for north york general hospital to purhase medical and capital improvements and support the hospital program and staff training and education. with the foundation's funding…

—
11
Durham Tamils Foundation
—
12
The Participation House Project (Durham Region)

The primary purpose of the organization is to provide and maintain residential facilities for physically disabled persons and to provide care and education to them. ph durham also creates community and activities for disabled people.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oak Ridges Hospice of Durham Ltd. and the most unlike its peers is Adopt a Village in Laos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOAK RIDGES HOSPICE — C$126,875 over 6y, 16% of budgetPORT PERRY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$73,530 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLAKERIDGE HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$56,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRANDVIEW CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — C$42,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetROTARY FOUNDATION (CANADA) — C$15,947 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDURHAM COLLEGE — C$13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION SCUGOG — C$10,550 over 2y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE DURHAM — C$5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRENT UNIVERSITY — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetADOPT A VILLAGE IN LAOS — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING DURHAM NORTH — C$2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOXES — C$2,508 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetONTARIO TECH UNIVERSITY — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HOUSE — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Durham Community Foun…Ontario Power Generat…Herman Kassinger Foun…Port Perry Pastoral C…United Way of Durham …Church of the Ascensi…St. John's Presbyteri…Greenbank United Chur…Raymond James Canada …Andrew FoundationWilliam F Hayball Cha…Oshawa Parkwood Rotar…
Durham Community FoundationON12.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Durham Community Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Herman Kassinger Foundation · Port Perry Pastoral Charge · United Way of Durham Region · Church of the Ascension · St. John's Presbyterian Church · Greenbank United Church · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Andrew Foundation · William F Hayball Charitable Foundation · Oshawa Parkwood Rotary Club Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 886285196:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rotary Club of Port Perry Ontario’s filings →