Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The RJS Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therfrom from time to time to 'qualified donees' under the income tax act (canada).

C$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$58k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$19k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$39k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$58k
C$2,800
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEKET CANADAC$58,090
NETIVOT HATORAHC$27,200
ADI REHABILITATION OF CANADAC$12,000
MISHKAN AVRAHAMC$8,300
MIZRACHI CANADAC$2,800
ONE TORONTOC$1,800
KAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTREC$1,800
EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLSC$1,800
RUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATIONC$1,000
SHAAREI SHOMAYIM CONGREGATIONC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$299k · 8 repeat orgsC$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

C$299k
C$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$17k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LEKET CANADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$88k · revenue +176%
  • NH
    NETIVOT HATORAH
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$62k · revenue +37%
  • MA
    MISHKAN AVRAHAM
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$15k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • KC
    KINGSTON CHAMBER CHOIR (KCC) INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue +127%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -30%
  • HT
    HATZOLOH TORONTO
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
4
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
5
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
6
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
7
Bais Chomesh High School for Girls

The Charity operates an orthodox Jewish high school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the Jewish faith as well as general academic studies. The Charity carries on edu- cational programs to provide teachers…

—
8
Yeshivas Nefesh Dovid

The organization operates a religious jewish high school for deaf and hearing impaired students who desire a religious jewish education and who are unable to attend or would have great difficulty attending a conventional religious jewish…

—
9
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
10
Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora

The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith

—
11
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
12
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mishkan Avraham and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLYR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$115,875 over 2y, 20% of budgetLEKET CANADA — C$88,090 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH — C$61,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMISHKAN AVRAHAM — C$14,900 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetADI REHABILITATION OF CANADA — C$12,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$6,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGSTON CHAMBER CHOIR (KCC) INC — C$5,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIZRACHI CANADA — C$4,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAAREI SHOMANYIM CONGREGATION — C$4,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOV — C$3,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH TORONTO — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH CANADA — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silver Family Charita…Zichron Binyomin Char…Jewish Foundation of …Krauss Family Charita…Israel Koschitzky Fam…Mizrachi Organization…The Amayn Charitable …Rayjo Charitable TrustMy Charity FundConam Charitable Foun…The Aulis Charitable …The Ulmer Greenspan C…
Silver Family Charitable FoundationON10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silver Family Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Krauss Family Charitable Trust · Israel Koschitzky Family Charitable Foundation · Mizrachi Organization Of Canada · The Amayn Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · My Charity Fund · Conam Charitable Foundation · The Aulis Charitable Foundation · The Ulmer Greenspan Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 766583801:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on RJS’ filings →