Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Aulis Charitable Foundation

Distributing income and capital to other 'qualified donees' within the meaning of the income tax act (canada) whose objects are confined to charitable purposes and funding and maintaining endowments in support of such objects.

C$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$28k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k9 grants · C$16k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$47k
C$1,800
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$930k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLSC$27,890
YISMACH MOSHE HEVRAGE PINTOC$19,280
SHAAREI SHOMAYIM CONGREGATIONC$3,606
THE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLELC$3,600
PETAH TIKVA - ANSHE CASTILLA CONGREGATIONC$2,800
HR CANADA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONC$1,800
EMUNAH CANADAC$1,600
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$1,100
THE VILLAGE SHULC$800
RUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATIONC$360
OHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONC$360
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$276k · 12 repeat orgsC$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

C$276k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$137k · revenue +94%
  • SS
    SHAAREI SHOMAYIM CONGREGATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$52k · revenue +2%
  • NH
    NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$28k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CZ
    CANADIAN ZIONIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$4k · revenue +38%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +88%
  • PO
    PEACE OF MIND CANADA
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
3
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
4
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
7
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
8
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
9
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—
10
Abraham Kahn

The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.

—
11
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
12
Congregation Beth Tikvah Ahavat Shalom-Nusach Hoari

To promote jewish religious educational and youth programs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mizrachi Organization of Canada and the most unlike its peers is P.O.M. - United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
16/30
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$137,065 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSHAAREI SHOMAYIM CONGREGATION — C$51,720 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL — C$27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYISMACH MOSHE HEVRAGE PINTO — C$19,280 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$18,152 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$14,536 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY — C$5,580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLEL — C$4,960 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL ASSOCIATION — C$4,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPETAH TIKVA - ANSHE CASTILLA CONGREGATION — C$4,112 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEMUNAH CANADA — C$4,050 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN ZIONIST CULTURAL ASSOCIATION — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHR CANADA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$3,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE OF MIND CANADA — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE (THE HOUSE) — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$770 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXER MIZION — C$650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOBA FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMIZRACHI CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATION — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAISH TORONTO — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOV — C$220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSICK KIDS FOUNDATION — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Foundation of …Rayjo Charitable TrustZichron Binyomin Char…Silver Family Charita…The Estaron FoundationThe Weitz Family Foun…Jack and Doris Bistri…The Friedberg Charita…Fieldgate Cares Found…Heitner Charitable Fo…My Charity FundConam Charitable Foun…
Jewish Foundation of Greater TorontoON13.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Silver Family Charitable Foundation · The Estaron Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Conam Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 853212587:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Aulis’ filings →