Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Phineas Kurtz Family Foundation

Establishing a fund for which support payments were made to registered charities for the maintenance assistance support of charitable endeavors and the advancement of religion education and scientific knowledge.

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$300
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$133k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NER ISRAEL YESHIVAC$1,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FUNDC$650
THE SHTEIBELC$400
THE SHTEIBELC$300
ZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATIONC$169
THE SHTEIBELC$150
CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOVC$130
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$53k · 8 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

C$53k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-3%

Still filing today

63%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TIFERES BAIS YAKOV
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$16k · revenue +31%
  • NI
    Ner Israel Yeshivah
    3× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +135%
  • JH
    JEWSIH HERITAGE FUND
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$2k · revenue +423%

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF NEVE YERUSHALAYIM
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue -52%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TZEDAKAH MEIR BAAL HANESS OF JERUSALEMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$455 · revenue +110%
  • BO
    Brothers Of Mercy
    one grant, 2017 · C$180 · revenue -75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
3
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
4
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
5
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
6
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
7
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
8
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
9
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—
10
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
11
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
12
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is The Brothers of Mercy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIFERES BAIS YAKOV — C$16,050 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNer Israel Yeshivah — C$7,336 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF NEVE YERUSHALAYIM — C$4,830 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTORATH EMETH CONGREGATION — C$2,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWSIH HERITAGE FUND — C$1,720 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHTEIBEL — C$850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEGINEI CHANA ASSOCIATION OF TORONTO — C$536 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TZEDAKAH MEIR BAAL HANESS OF JERUSALEM — C$455 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers Of Mercy — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATION — C$169 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOV — C$130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVMM ZICHRON — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE — C$54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOMREI SHABBOS CHEVREI MISHNAYOS CONGREGATION — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$44 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS AUXILARY OF NER ISRAEL — C$36 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCanadian Friends Of Yad Lachim — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBnei Tzion — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The S. Sigler Family Charitable FoundationON16.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · 479 Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · Abraham Bleeman Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 119251148:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Phineas Kurtz Family’s filings →