Sudbury, ON · Charitable organization
The Little Servants of Christ the King Prayer Community
We continue offer weekly meetings and monthly planning meetings.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUR LADY OF HOPE CATHOLIC CHURCH | C$5,400 |
| SOCIÉTÉ DES MISSIONS AFRICANES | C$1,000 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH - HOLY NAME OF JESUS | C$500 |
| SISTERS OF LIFE | C$200 |
| HANDMAIDS OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SSOCIÉTÉ5× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +73%
- ICINNER CITY HOME OF SUDBURY4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue +456%
- BDBLUE DOOR SOUP KITCHENER4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- COCOMPANIONS OF THE CROSSone grant, 2019 · C$500
- SOSISTERS OF ST. JOSEPHone grant, 2022 · C$250 · revenue +18%
- CCCatholic Charismatic Renewal Services of Ontarioone grant, 2017 · C$180 · revenue -76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides financial support to parishes missionaries and other charitable organizations.
Corporation religieuse missionaire qui a pour fins la religion l'éducation et la santé.
Provide a place of prayer and hospitality
Les objectifs de la corporation sont la religion la charité l'enseignement l'éducaiton et les soins hospitaliers.
Corporation religieuse missionnaire qui a pour fins la religion l'éducation et la santé.
supporting women in treatment centres
Communauté religieuse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sisters of Life - Canada and the most unlike its peers is Metanoia Outreach Association of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUR LADY OF HOPE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY HOME OF SUDBURY ↗
- Who funds BLUE DOOR SOUP KITCHENER ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF LIFE CANADA ↗
- Who funds COMPANIONS OF THE CROSS ↗
- Who funds Birthright ↗
- Who funds C.C.S.O. BREAD OF LIFE ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds HANDMAIDS OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charismatic Renewal Services of Ontario ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sudbury #10888 Foundation · Centennial Council 6074 Charitable Trust · Bishop Alexander Carter Foundation · The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Sault Ste. Marie in Ontario Canada · The Lougheed Foundation · My Charity Fund · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.