Skip to content

Sudbury, ON · Public foundation

Bishop Alexander Carter Foundation

Distributes funds to other charitable organizations in northeastern ontario

C$342k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$13k
  • C$10k–50k9 grants · C$179k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$150k
C$18,559
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
L'ARCHE SUDBURY INC.C$80,000
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of SSMC$70,000
Maison McCulloch HospiceC$40,000
The Gathering PlaceC$35,000
St Vincent's Place Inc.C$20,000
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of SSMC$20,000
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of SaulC$18,559
Near North Palliative Care NetworkC$15,000
SOUP KITCHEN COMMUNITY CENTREC$10,000
Inner City Home of SudburyC$10,000
Elgin Street MissionC$10,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Sault Ste. Marie Inc.C$8,000
Blue Door Soup KitchenC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.3M · 32 repeat orgsC$333k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
23

Total granted

C$2.3M
C$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    L'ARCHE SUDBURY INC.
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$260k · revenue +71%
  • RC
    Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of SSM
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$199k · revenue +155%
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$175k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SH
    Sudbury Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue -94%
  • VI
    Vale Inco Hospicegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue +80%
  • SA
    Sault Area Hospital Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$50k · revenue +232%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Larch Half Way House of Sudbury

Providing half way house facilities in sudbury for prosioners ex-prisoners and parolees for shelter food supervision counseling rehabilitation recreation life skill development addiction counseling job search skills and other assistance as…

—
2
Native People of Sudbury Development Corporation

Provide economic and social assistance to native families within the sudbury area by providing affordable housing.

—
3
Social Planning Council of Sudbury
—
4
Banque D'aliments Sudbury Food Bank

To alleviate the hunger of those living in the city of greater sudbury using the resources of the community and reaching out with tangible food and support

—
5
Sudbury Finnishrest Home Society Inc.

Residential accomodations for elderly persons. related services for elderly persons.

—
6
St. Joseph's Continuing Care Centre of Sudbury

Operates a public hospital for continuing care

—
7
Sudbury's Centre for Transitional Care
—
8
Sudbury and Area Victim Services/Services Aux Victimes Du Grand Sudbury
—
9
South Huron Handicapped Services Inc.

Provide accommodation and services to individuals with developmental challenges.

—
10
Health Sciences North Foundation / Fondation Horizon Sante-Nord

The foundation was established to collect accumulate and distribute funds for the benefit of health sciences north and any other charitable organizations that provide health care services in the city of greater sudbury and its outlying…

—
11
North Bay Recovery Home

The organization provides residential and non-residential services for alcoholics and drug addicts who are committed to recovery. the program includes group and individual counselling food shelter prevention support safety assessment and…

—
12
St. Joseph's Health Centre of Sudbury

Operations of long-term care faciliites

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sudbury Action Centre for Youth and the most unlike its peers is Elgin Street Mission (Sudbury). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
41/53
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANISHINABE SPIRITUAL CENTRE — C$310,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetL'ARCHE SUDBURY INC. — C$260,042 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE — C$175,120 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES CANADA — C$175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVincent's Place Inc. — C$136,500 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetNORTH BAY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$100,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSUDBURY CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD — C$85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMaison McCulloch Hospice — C$80,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetALGOMA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY HOSPICE — C$77,150 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetINNER CITY HOME OF SUDBURY — C$75,000 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetPAULINE'S PLACE YOUTH SHELTER — C$74,500 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — C$70,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVale Inco Hospice — C$50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSault Area Hospital Foundation — C$50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSOUP KITCHEN COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$49,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetBLUE DOOR SOUP KITCHEN — C$48,250 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetELGIN STREET MISSION — C$38,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetHOUSE OF KIN — C$38,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THEHURONSUPERIOR CATHOL — C$33,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetBIG BROTHER / BIG SISTERS GREATER SUDBURY — C$32,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetKEN BROWN RECOVERY HOME FOUNDATION — C$29,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetConseil scolaire de district catholique du Nouvel-Ontario — C$25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetONE ELEVEN SENIOR CITIZEN CENTRE — C$25,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetNORTH BAY INDIGENOUS FRIENDSHIP CENTRE — C$23,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUDBURY MANITOULIN CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — C$21,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetNipissing Hospice — C$18,522 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTH BAY — C$18,300 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF SUDBURY — C$18,000 over 5y, 65% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Sault Ste. Marie Inc. — C$18,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetLEARNING DISABILITIES ASSOCIATION - SUDBURY — C$16,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetNear North Palliative Care Network — C$15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL - ST KEVIN'S CONFERENCE — C$15,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetSudbury Action Centre Youth — C$15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNIPPISING PARRY SOUND CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD — C$11,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCONSEIL SCOLAIRE CATHOLIC FRANCO-NORD — C$11,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetECOLE SECONDAIRE ALGONQUIN — C$11,000 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetMonarch Recovery Services — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPREGANCY CARE CENTRE — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLearning Diasbilities Association of Ontario - North Bay — C$9,900 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNOOJMOWIN TEG HEALTH CENTRE — C$9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN CRISIS (LAGOMA) INC — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetL'Arche-North Bay — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBRENTON HOUSE — C$7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels Sudbury — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCanadian DeafBLind Association ON Chapter — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPatrick 4 Life Aids Awareness and Education — C$5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNORTH SHORE SEARCH AND RESCUE — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTWINKLE FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sisters of St Joseph of Sault Ste MarieON26.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sisters of St Joseph of Sault Ste Marie · The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Sault Ste. Marie in Ontario Canada · Centennial Council 6074 Charitable Trust · John Carl Macisaac Foundation · Sudbury Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire de Sudbury · The Lougheed Foundation · Sudbury #10888 Foundation · United Way Centraide North East Ontario / Nord-est de l'Ontario · Dr. Lou and Mae Lukenda Charitable Foundation · Ontario Realtors Care Foundation · Hydro One Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Banque D'Aliments Sudbury Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under teaching institutions.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 885835512:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bishop Alexander Carter’s filings →