Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

The Jack Herbert Charitable Foundation

The primary objective of THE JACK HERBERT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is to fund organizations selected by the trustess which are registered charities under the income tax act (canada) provided that the charities thereby selected by the trustees shall be charitable organizations that directly carry our charitable works in canada.

C$94k
Granted FY2019
10
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$24k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$70k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LES AMIS DES JARDINS DE METISC$45,000
L'ASSOCATION DU CANCER DE L'EST DU QUEBECC$25,000
PARK DE LA RIVIERE MITISC$6,000
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUES SECTION BAS-STC$5,000
FOUNDATION PARKINSON BSLC$5,000
FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A RIMOUSKI INC.(UQAR)C$4,000
AMIS ET ANCIENS DU CONSERVATOIRE DE MUSIQUE DE RIMOUSKIC$1,500
MOISSON RIMOUSKI-NEIGETTEC$1,000
CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE RIMOUSKIC$1,000
FONDATION DU CJBSC (CENTRE JEUNESSE BAS ST. LARENT)C$600
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$181k · 9 repeat orgsC$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

C$181k
C$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LES AMIS DES JARDINS DE METIS
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$95k · revenue +184%
  • LD
    L'ASSOCATION DU CANCER DE L'EST DU QUEBEC
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$28k · revenue +41%
  • LS
    La Societe Parkinson de Bas St. Laurent
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$16k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • CD
    Carrefour de la litterature, des arts et de la culture
    one grant, 2018 · C$11k · revenue +21%
  • FD
    Fondation du Centre Hopitalier Regional de Rimouski
    one grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue -45%
  • FP
    Fondation Prevention du Suicide BSLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +327%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation Jonquière-Médic
—
2
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
3
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
4
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
5
Fondation Louis-St-Laurent
—
6
Fondation Maxime-Letendre
—
7
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
8
La Fondation Richelieu Des Trois-Lacs
—
9
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
10
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
11
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
12
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centraide Bas St-Laurent and the most unlike its peers is Parc De La Riviere Metis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLES AMIS DES JARDINS DE METIS — C$94,650 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetL'ASSOCATION DU CANCER DE L'EST DU QUEBEC — C$27,830 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPark de la riviere Mitis — C$21,500 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetLa Societe Parkinson de Bas St. Laurent — C$16,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCarrefour de la litterature, des arts et de la culture — C$10,835 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFondation du Centre Hopitalier Regional de Rimouski — C$9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFondation de L'Universite Du Quebec A Rimouski Inc — C$9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUES SECTION BAS-ST — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Prevention du Suicide BSL — C$2,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetAMIS ET ANCIENS DU CONSERVATOIRE DE MUSIQUE DE RIMOUSKI — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFond. du Centre Jeunesse Bas St. Laurent — C$1,830 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLa grande guignolée des médias de la Rive-Sud — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCentraide Bas-Saint-Laurent — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFondation Rêve d'Enfant — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE RIMOUSKI — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFondation de l'Hôpital de Matane — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMOISSON RIMOUSKI-NEIGETTE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAux Trois Mâts — C$800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSociete Canadienne du cancer — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

TELUS Friendly Future…Oeuvres Caritatives D…Centraide Québec Cha…Union Canadienne des …Fondation Maurice Tan…Union Canadienne Des …Fonds de Bienfaisance…Fondation Ernest Sima…Soeurs de Saint-Paul-…Telus Employees Chari…Fondation Sibylla Hes…Fondation St-Hubert
TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur MeilleurBC11× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · Union Canadienne Des Moniales de L'Ordre de Saint Ursule · Fonds de Bienfaisance Du Club Lion de Rimouski · Fondation Ernest Simard · Soeurs de Saint-Paul-de-Chartres · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation St-Hubert

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under support of schools and education.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2021) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 866656655:2019-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jack Herbert’s filings →