Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Rimouski, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Ernest Simard

La FONDATION ERNEST SIMARD vise à venir principalement en aide aus enfants les plus démunis des régions de rimouski et de matane au québec ainsi que de l'afrique lieux où le fondateur a ouvré pendant plusieurs années.

C$420
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$420
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$420
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$839k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VISION MONDIALEC$420
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$31k · 6 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +100% since the first grant, against +80% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

C$31k
C$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+80%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$420 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Fondation pour la persévérance scolaire Fleuve-et-des-lacs
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$8k · revenue +137%
  • FD
    Fondation du centre jeunesse BSL
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$7k · revenue +67%
  • RP
    Repit Pabok Inc
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$5k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • FS
    Fabrique St-Germain
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$6k · revenue +24%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER RÉGIONAL DE RIMOUSKI
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -45%
  • CA
    Centre action bénévole le p'tit bonheurgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Entraide Le Rameau De Rimouski
—
2
Maison Des Familles De Rimouski-Neigette

Favoriser l'entraide au sein des familles

—
3
Maison Des Jeunes Le Jouvenceau

Fournir aux jeunes un endroit pour se divertir dans le secteur de dolbeau-mistassini

—
4
La Popote Roulante 'Les Délices Maison'
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Royaume
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Viateur
—
7
La Maison Des Jeunes Au Coeur Des Montagnes

Maison des jeunes

—
8
Maison Le Ricochet
—
9
La Moisson Maskoutaine

Enrayer la faim et la pauvreté en récupérant et redistribuant gratuitement aux organismes communautaires le surplus agroalimentaire en sensibilisant la population et les instances concernées et en contribuant à la mise en place des…

—
10
Maison Des Jeunes L'authentique
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
12
Point De Rue De Trois-RiviÈRes & Nicolet - Yamaska
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation SantÉ Rimouski and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFondation pour la persévérance scolaire Fleuve-et-des-lacs — C$7,612 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetFondation du centre jeunesse BSL — C$7,194 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetFabrique St-Germain — C$5,605 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRepit Pabok Inc — C$4,876 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER RÉGIONAL DE RIMOUSKI — C$4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UQAR — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON VALLÉE DE LA MATAPÉDIA — C$3,934 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLe fonds d'entraide du kamouraska — C$3,637 over 3y, 11% of budgetCentre action bénévole le p'tit bonheur — C$2,486 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLECTIF ALIMENT-TERRE — C$2,390 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE KAMOURASKA — C$1,240 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAISON DES FAMILLES DE LA MATANIE — C$1,044 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOISSON RIMOUSKI-NEIGETTE INC — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE DES MASQUES — C$800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMaison des jeunes — C$516 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVISION MONDIALE — C$420 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation Bon Départ …Union Canadienne des …The Jack Herbert Char…Corporation Du Semina…Les Banques alimentai…Fondation Maurice Tan…Union Canadienne Des …Fondation Laure Gaudr…TELUS Friendly Future…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way East Ontar…
Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurentQC9.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Bon Départ de Canadian Tire du Québec Inc. · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · The Jack Herbert Charitable Foundation · Corporation Du Seminaire de St-Germain de Rimouski · Les Banques alimentaires du Québec / Food Banks of Québec · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · Union Canadienne Des Moniales de L'Ordre de Saint Ursule · Fondation Laure Gaudreault · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 890643919:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Ernest Simard’s filings →