Skip to content

Glenboro, MB · Public foundation

The Glenboro Area Foundation Inc

THE GLENBORO AREA FOUNDATION INC assists provides and promotes betterment of the citizens of the town of glenboro and surrounding area in the cultural mental and physical aspects of life in the community.

C$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k12 grants · C$41k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$90k
C$3,163
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$272k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUNICIPALITY OF GLENBORO SOUTH CYPRESSC$90,254
ASSINIBOINE COMMUNITY COLLEGEC$7,851
UNIVERSITY OF KING'S COLLEGEC$5,443
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARYC$4,785
GLENBORO CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTREC$4,212
GLENBORO UNITED CHURCHC$4,016
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBAC$3,163
RAYSTONE MEMORIAL CENTREC$3,001
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWANC$2,260
GLENBORO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETYC$2,000
GLENBORO SOUTHCYPRESS LIBRARYC$1,800
BRANDON UNIVERSITYC$1,745
KATIE CARES INC.C$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$508k · 12 repeat orgsC$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

C$508k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+17%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$31k · revenue +20%
  • BU
    BRANDON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$22k · revenue +18%
  • AC
    ASSINIBOINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$19k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
    one grant, 2022 · C$4k
  • PU
    Providence University College
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +17%
  • UO
    UNIVERISTY OF NEW BRUNSWICK
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Governors of the University of Alberta

The University of Alberta operates under the Post-Secondary Learning Act of the Province of Alberta to provide post-secondary and graduate education and to engage in research and public service. The university has approximately 40 061…

—
2
Brock University

Teaching and Research in broadly based undergraduate and graduate education programs including professional and interdisciplinary programs. The University provides education programs across seven faculties: Applied Health Sciences Business…

—
3
University of the Fraser Valley

The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…

—
4
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—
5
Thompson Rivers University

Thompson Rivers University operates as an accredited Post Secondary University offering a variety of undergraduate and masters degrees as well as a variety of diplomas certificates and continuing education courses.

—
6
University of Guelph

The University carries out teaching research extension education activities and opportunities through student scholarships and bursaries travel grants and learning initiatives. In addition the University's operating and ancillary services…

—
7
University of British Columbia

Post Secondary Education & Research

—
8
Yukon University

Facilitation and deliver of post-secondary education including northern research.

—
9
Carleton University

Carleton University provides post-secondary education.

—
10
University of Waterloo

The pursuit of learning through scholarship teaching and research.

—
11
University of Ottawa / UniversitÉ D'ottawa

The university of ottawa offers post-secondary education.

—
12
Luther College Regina

Luther college operates an independent boarding/day school that provides education for students from grade 9 to 12 following the saskatchewan school curriculum as well as the international baccalaureate program. luther college also…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Regina and the most unlike its peers is Katie Cares Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA — C$31,269 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLENBORO UNITED CHURCH — C$22,569 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetBRANDON UNIVERSITY — C$22,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASSINIBOINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE — C$18,719 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRAYSTONE MEMORIAL CENTRE INC. — C$16,112 over 6y, 44% of budgetGLENBORO CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTRE — C$13,411 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGLENBORO SOUTHCYPRESS LIBRARY — C$12,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGLENBORO AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$10,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$6,395 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KING'S COLLEGE — C$5,443 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALGARY — C$4,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProvidence University College — C$2,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REGINA — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERISTY OF NEW BRUNSWICK — C$1,511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Winnipeg — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED RIVER COLLEGE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Lethbridge — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATIE CARES INC. — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTH — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlenboro Lutheran Church — C$200 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winkler Community Foundation Inc.MB11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winkler Community Foundation Inc. · The Brandon Area Community Foundation Inc. · Community Foundation of Swan Valley Inc. · The Winnipeg Foundation · Manitoba Foundation for Sports Inc · All Charities Campaign · Souris Glenwood Foundation Inc. · Living Legacy Community Foundation Inc. · Actua · The Boissevain and Morton Foundation Incorporated · The Virden Area Foundation Inc. · The Leonard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 120653670:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Glenboro Area’s filings →