Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Public foundation

Manitoba Foundation for Sports Inc

C1 - providing educational scholarships to athletes enrolled in post-secondary institutions.

C$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$443k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBAC$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEGC$3,000
RED RIVER COLLEGE POLYTECC$1,000
UNIVERSAITE DE SAINT BONIFACEC$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWANC$500
UNIVERSITY OF REGINAC$500
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTAC$500
BRANDON UNIVERSITYC$500
CANADIAN MENNONITE UNIVERSITYC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$717k · 9 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
23

Total granted

C$717k
C$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$49k · revenue +20%
  • AC
    Assiniboine Community College
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$5k · revenue ×13
  • BU
    Brandon University
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • BU
    BRANDON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • UO
    University of British Columbiagraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +43%
  • PC
    PROVIDENCE COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brock University

Teaching and Research in broadly based undergraduate and graduate education programs including professional and interdisciplinary programs. The University provides education programs across seven faculties: Applied Health Sciences Business…

—
2
The University of Winnipeg

Providing education

—
3
The University of Lethbridge

The University of Lethbridge educates at a post-secondary level in both Lethbridge and Calgary at undergraduate and graduate levels. The University conducts research in the Faculty of Arts and Science Business Fine Arts Education Health…

—
4
University of the Fraser Valley

The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…

—
5
Thompson Rivers University

Thompson Rivers University operates as an accredited Post Secondary University offering a variety of undergraduate and masters degrees as well as a variety of diplomas certificates and continuing education courses.

—
6
University of Ottawa / UniversitÉ D'ottawa

The university of ottawa offers post-secondary education.

—
7
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—
8
Yukon University

Facilitation and deliver of post-secondary education including northern research.

—
9
University of Prince Edward Island

Post-Secondary Education

—
10
Carleton University

Carleton University provides post-secondary education.

—
11
Universite Concordia

The main mission of the University is to provide post-secondary and graduate education. It engages in research public services and assists students faculties and researchers. Concordia University Faculty of Arts and Science Gina Cody…

—
12
Alberta University of the Arts

Post-secondary education in the field of visual art and design. alberta university of the arts (auarts) provides bachelor of fine arts bachelor of design and masters of fine arts programs.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Manitoba and the most unlike its peers is Providence University College and Theological Seminary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA — C$48,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAssiniboine Community College — C$4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBrandon University — C$4,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSAITE DE SAINT BONIFACE — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRED RIVER COLLEGE POLYTEC — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of British Columbia — C$1,298 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REGINA — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYORK UNIVERSITY — C$800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANCOUVER ISLAND UNIVERSITY — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNipissing University — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ROCKIES — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA ↗
  • Who funds Assiniboine Community College ↗
  • Who funds Brandon University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSAITE DE SAINT BONIFACE ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER COLLEGE POLYTEC ↗
  • Who funds University of British Columbia ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REGINA ↗
  • Who funds YORK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER ISLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Nipissing University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ROCKIES ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg FoundationMB10.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · The Glenboro Area Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Swan Valley Inc. · The Winkler Community Foundation Inc. · The Virden Area Foundation Inc. · The Leonard Foundation · The Calgary Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · All Charities Campaign · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 136030038:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Manitoba Foundation for Sports’ filings →