Skip to content
Canadian charities

Newcastle, ON · Private foundation

The Edmond & Sylvia Vanhaverbeke Foundation

Donated to Autism Home Base Donated Graduation awards to St.

C$304k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$11k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$58k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$236k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Durham Region HospiceC$100,000
Trent UniversityC$86,280
Autism Home Base Durham Inc.C$50,000
Durham College FoundationC$32,500
Ontario Tech UniversityC$25,000
Northumberland Learning ConnectionC$5,000
Alzheimer Society Durham RegionC$2,000
St. Stephen Catholic Secondary SchoolC$2,000
Fred VictorC$1,000
Durham Youth OrchestraC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.0M · 13 repeat orgsC$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

C$1.0M
C$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+8%

Still filing today

92%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OU
    OntarioTech University
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$278k · revenue +28%
  • DC
    Durham College Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$223k · revenue +52%
  • DR
    Durham Region Hospice
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$110k · revenue +488%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of St Michael's College
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +8%
  • DF
    DURHAM FAMILY COURT CLINIC
    one grant, 2019 · C$8k · revenue +4%
  • VA
    Visual Arts Centre of Clarington
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Durham College of Applied Arts and Technology
—
2
The Durham District School Board

Education in ontario

—
3
Durham Region Critical Incident Stress Support Team

Supply emotional support services to emergency responders in time of crisis teach pre-incident prevention to mitigate effects of trauma

—
4
Durham Mental Health Services

Durham mental health services provides a range of services to people with serious long standing mental health difficulties. programs include: four residential support houses a case management program community based crisis services court…

—
5
York University Foundation - Fondation De L'universite York
—
6
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
7
Durham Mental Health Services Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and other property and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time for the benefit of durham mental health services. durham mental health services provides a range of…

—
8
The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Instruction and research in a university.

—
9
York University

York University provided the following programs/activities: - Undergraduate degree programs - Graduate degree programs - Non-credit courses - Sponsored research - Ancillary operations (for the benefit of students)

—
10
Durham Art Gallery

Advancement of the public's appreciation of the arts by presenting a broad range of arts practices and by providing educational activities

—
11
University Health Network / RÉSeau Universitaire De SantÉ

University health network/réseau universitaire de santé ('uhn'0 is canada's largest healthcare reaserach organization. our primary value is the needs of patients come first. uhn operates four hospitals. these hospitals are separately…

—
12
North York General Hospital Foundation

North york general hospital foundation raises and stewards funds for north york general hospital to purhase medical and capital improvements and support the hospital program and staff training and education. with the foundation's funding…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oshawa-Durham Rape Crisis Centre and the most unlike its peers is Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOntarioTech University — C$277,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDurham College Foundation — C$222,500 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetDurham Region Hospice — C$110,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTrent University — C$106,280 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBowmanville Hospital Foundation — C$105,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetAutism Home Base Durham Inc. — C$60,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetDurham Rape Crisis Centre — C$51,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetOntario Philharmonic — C$27,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetGanaraska Conservation Authority — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of St Michael's College — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthumberland Learning Connection — C$9,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetDURHAM FAMILY COURT CLINIC — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAlzheimer Society Durham Region — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST. STEPHEN'S SECONDARY SCHOOL — C$1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Red Cross — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Victor — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDurham Youth Orchestra — C$500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAMH Foundation — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Durham Community Foun…William F Hayball Cha…Ontario Power Generat…Herman Kassinger Foun…Rotary Club of Bowman…Oshawa Parkwood Rotar…St. Joseph's Council …Deer Creek Cares Char…Pickering Rotary Club…BenefAction FoundationConam Charitable Foun…Toronto Foundation
Durham Community FoundationON12.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Durham Community Foundation · William F Hayball Charitable Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Herman Kassinger Foundation · Rotary Club of Bowmanville Charitable Trust · Oshawa Parkwood Rotary Club Charitable Foundation · St. Joseph's Council No. 6361 Charitable Welfare Trust · Deer Creek Cares Charitable Foundation · Pickering Rotary Club Charitable Trust · BenefAction Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Toronto Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 833762099:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Edmond & Sylvia Vanhaverbeke’s filings →