North York, ON · Charitable organization
The East Toronto Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church
Place of worship -social outreach -support for missions & other projects -pastoral care
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADA-UKRANIAN FOUNDATION | C$3,000 |
| ST ANDREW'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CONGREGATION | C$300 |
| LELBA-CANADIAN DISTRICT | C$70 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SBSt. Barnabas' Church2× · 2018–2023 · C$3k · revenue +14%
- SAST. ANDREW'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CONGREGATION2× · 2023–2024 · C$600 · revenue +7%
- LDLELBA-CANADIAN DISTRICT6× · 2017–2024 · C$409 · revenue +29%
Funded once
- SJST. JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CHURCH OF TORONTOgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$300 · revenue +33%
- CLChrist Latvian Evangelical Lutheran Churchone grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue -11%
- KDKRISTUS DARZS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$200 · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Supporting other charities through donations
Religious education place of worship 50% missionary evangelism - 20% social outreach - 30%
To provide housing and care for the elderly through the operation of a home for the aged and to promte the emotional and physical well being of the residents by providing recreational therapeutic and social programs.
Provides financial & other assistance to needy persons promotion of social & cultural welfare of persons of latvian origin who reside in canada support children elderly and handicapped people in latvia assist needy youths to obtain…
Concerts and Festivals promotion and support for performing groups composers musical ensembles grants and awards for Canadian artists.
1. religious advancement 2. financial support for ministry to minorities in canada 3. financial support for ministry work outside of canada 4. financial support for education in theology through grants to lutheran seminaries in canada 5.…
Serving the Estonian Lutheran community in Hamilton and surrounding areas as a congregation of the Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church in Estonia and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada.
Monthly worship services; pastoral care for shut-ins elderly and those in need; minister to spiritual needs of congregants and their families; bible study lectures sunday school; christian fellowship for latvian community in ottawa;…
To assist with the educational programs of the museum of occupation in giga latvia; to assist with the scholarship programs for the economically deprived.
Accumulation of capital to provide income to support cultural and educational programmes
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church of Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Canada-Ukraine Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANADA-UKRANIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds St. Barnabas' Church ↗
- Who funds ST. ANDREW'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CONGREGATION ↗
- Who funds LELBA-CANADIAN DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds ST. JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CHURCH OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds Christ Latvian Evangelical Lutheran Church ↗
- Who funds KRISTUS DARZS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF ↗
- Who funds LATVIAN CANADIAN CULTURAL CENTRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church of Toronto · The Latvian Relief Society of Canada 'Daugavas Vanagi' · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.