Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church of Toronto

Operate one or more places of worship of god with services conducted in the latvian (or other languages) in accordance with teh tenets and doctrines of the lutheran faith; maintain and operate a ministry of christian education in the knowledge of god and the guidance of all of life as revealed in the holy scriptures of both the old and…

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$400
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KRISTUS DARZS FOUNDATIONC$400
SCOTT MISSIONC$400
CHURCHES-ON-THE-HILL FOOD BANKC$400
YONGE STREET MISSIONC$400
ST. ANDREW'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CONGREGATION IN...C$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$20k · 6 repeat orgsC$850 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

C$20k
C$650

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHURCHES-ON0THE-HILL FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +467%
  • YS
    YONGE STREET MISSION
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$2k · revenue +11%
  • TE
    The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Latvia Abroad
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • LC
    LATVIAN CANADIAN CULTURAL CENTREgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$500 · revenue +42%
  • CF
    CHURCHES-ON-THE-HILL FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2019 · C$150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latvian Lutheran Congregation

Supporting other charities through donations

—
2
Kristus Darzs Latvian Home

To provide housing and care for the elderly through the operation of a home for the aged and to promte the emotional and physical well being of the residents by providing recreational therapeutic and social programs.

—
3
The Latvian Relief Society of Canada 'Daugavas Vanagi'

Provides financial & other assistance to needy persons promotion of social & cultural welfare of persons of latvian origin who reside in canada support children elderly and handicapped people in latvia assist needy youths to obtain…

—
4
Latvian National Federation in Canada Educational & Cultural Foundation
—
5
St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church of Toronto

Operate one or more places of worship of god with services conducted in the latvian (or other languages) in accordance with teh tenets and doctrines of the lutheran faith; maintain and operate a ministry of christian education in the…

—
6
Latvia Relief and Development Fund (Ontario)

To assist with the educational programs of the museum of occupation in giga latvia; to assist with the scholarship programs for the economically deprived.

—
7
Toronto Latvian Baptist Church
—
8
St Luke's Anglican Church

Worship services pastoral care community service outreach christian education community food bank support to local ukrainian refugees

—
9
University of Tartu Fund

To encourage and further the academic excellence of the university of tartu in estonia by ameliorating any inadequacy of physical resources experienced by the university as well as encouraging and supporting estonian studies at the…

—
10
The Latvian Evangelical Lutheran Church of Vancouver

Religious education place of worship 50% missionary evangelism - 20% social outreach - 30%

—
11
Lcc International Fund Inc.

Lcc international fund inc. (lcc) carries out its charitable activities through a joint ministry. the joint ministry is involved in education through the operation of its university in the country of lithuania -'lcc international…

—
12
Peace Latvian Evangelical Lutheran Church

Monthly worship services; pastoral care for shut-ins elderly and those in need; minister to spiritual needs of congregants and their families; bible study lectures sunday school; christian fellowship for latvian community in ottawa;…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. Andrew's Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Congregation in Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Churches-On-the-Hill Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — C$6,174 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHES-ON0THE-HILL FOOD BANK — C$5,960 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetYONGE STREET MISSION — C$2,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Evangelical Lutheran Church of Latvia Abroad — C$2,130 over 6y, 15% of budgetSCOTT MISSION — C$1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKRISTUS DARZS FOUNDATION — C$1,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLATVIAN CANADIAN CULTURAL CENTRE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST. ANDREW'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN LATVIAN CONGREGATION IN... — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The East Toronto Evan…United Way of Greater…Canadahelps Canadon
The East Toronto Evangelical Lutheran Latvian ChurchON8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The East Toronto Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 108023433:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Latvian Church of Toronto’s filings →