Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Warman, SK · Charitable organization

Sisters of Mission Service

Provides financial support to parishes missionaries and other charitable organizations.

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$600
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$300
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN RED CROSSC$600
THE SALVATION ARMYC$300
SASKATOON CITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$300
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSC$200
AMMI LACOMBE CANADAC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$17k · 15 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

C$17k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+11%

Still filing today

93%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY (SASKATOON)
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +462%
  • SC
    Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +27%
  • DW
    Doctors Without Borders
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • KO
    K. OF C. CHARITIES INC.graduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue +34%
  • SA
    St Ann's Senior Citizens Village Corp
    one grant, 2018 · C$300 · revenue +11%
  • S2
    Station 20 Westgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$200 · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
2
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
3
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
4
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
5
The Saskatchewan Catholic Health Corporation

The saskatchewan health corporation is responsible for the governance of health institutions formerly owned and operated by religious congregations. the corporation's involvement includes the raising of fudns necessary for projects and…

—
6
Saskatchewan Indigenous Community Foundation
—
7
Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc.

The foundation obtained it’s registered charity status on may 14 2018. the foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the cancer needs of the people of saskatchewan. as the fundraising partner for the saskatchewan cancer agency the…

—
8
Saskatchewan Stock Growers Foundation Inc.

To protect and preserve the environment enhance and restore natural ecosystem and wildlife habitat and to preserve indigeneous species of flora and fauna in Saskatchewan by acquiring conservations easements.

—
9
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
10
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

The saskatchewan cancer agency provided leadership in cancer control for the people of saskatchewan through prevention early detection treatment and research

—
11
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
12
Sask. Valley Hospital Foundation Inc.

To raise funds for a new hospital to replace the current hospital that is over 75 years old. this new hospital will have a 24/7 emergency department and operate as a full services health care facility. it will also be an educational…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diocese of Saskatoon Catholic Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Crocus Co-Operative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY (SASKATOON) — C$2,850 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$2,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatoon City Hospital Foundation — C$1,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDoctors Without Borders — C$1,450 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMMI LACOMBE CANADA — C$1,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSt. Paul's Hospital Foundation — C$1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRC Episcopal Corp of Keewatin — C$1,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBishops Annual Appeal — C$850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lighthouse Supported Living — C$625 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFARMLAND LEGACIES — C$600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFood Bank Learning Centre — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ploughshares — C$550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetK. OF C. CHARITIES INC. — C$500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCrocus Co-operative — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Ann's Senior Citizens Village Corp — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Research Society — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStation 20 West — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe David Suzuki Foundation — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJesuit Forum — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Les Filles de la Prov…Our Lady of the Prair…Saskatoon Community F…United Way of Saskato…Grk Family Foundation…Ursulines of St Angel…Leslie & Irene Dube F…Les Soeurs de Notre-D…The Order of St. Bene…Episcopal Corporation…Joseph Alfred Remai F…Sisters of St. Joseph…
Les Filles de la ProvidenceSK12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Les Filles de la Providence · Our Lady of the Prairies Foundation · Saskatoon Community Foundation · United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Grk Family Foundation Inc. · Ursulines of St Angela's Convent · Leslie & Irene Dube Foundation Inc. · Les Soeurs de Notre-Dame D'Auvergne · The Order of St. Benedict · Episcopal Corporation of Saskatoon · Joseph Alfred Remai Family Foundation Inc. · Sisters of St. Joseph of Chambéry Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119151223:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sisters of Mission Service’s filings →