Skip to content

Rosetown, SK · Public foundation

Rosetown & District Combined Appeal Donors Choice

We have an annual mail canvas in october in rosetown & surrounding areas.

C$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$350
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$94
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSETOWN & DISTRICT FOOD BANKC$3,685
ROSETOWN WHEELS FOR WHEELSC$2,365
ALEX OSITIS FOUNDATIONC$1,823
TOWN OF ROSETOWNC$1,655
WHEATLAND REGIONAL CENTRE FOUNDATIONC$890
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$760
CHILDREN'S WISH FOUNDATIONC$645
ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF SASKATCHEWANC$645
HEART & STROKE FOUNDATIONC$625
KIDSPORTC$600
ROSETOWN KID KAREC$595
CANADIAN DIABETES FOUNDATIONC$575
CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR THE BLINDC$545
SALVATION ARMYC$355
AMYLOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS SOCIETYC$350
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$180k · 37 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
13

Total granted

C$180k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+27%

Still filing today

62%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    ROSETOWN DISTRICT FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$29k · revenue +84%
  • AO
    Alex Ositis Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$22k · revenue ×18 · 34% of their budget
  • WR
    WHEATLAND REGIONAL CENTRE FDN
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$11k · revenue +225% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • CD
    Canadian Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k
  • RD
    ROSETOWN & DISTRICT HEALTH CENTRE
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +10%
  • RK
    ROSETOWN KID KARE INC
    one grant, 2019 · C$675

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
2
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
3
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

The saskatchewan cancer agency provided leadership in cancer control for the people of saskatchewan through prevention early detection treatment and research

—
4
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
5
Scleroderma Association of Saskatchewan

We provide information and support to Scleroderma patients and their families. We promote awareness of Scleroderma to Doctors and the general public. We raise money for medical research of Scleroderma. We provide money for Scleroderma…

—
6
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—
7
Saskatchewan Safety Council

Saskatchewan Safety Council provides quality up to date safety education programming in Saskatchewan. Thousands of participants were given injury prevention training in over 80 different programs focusing on youth seniors industries and…

—
8
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
9
Canada Safety Council/Conseil canadien de la sécurité

The Canada Safety Council is Canada's National Not-for-profit Safety Organization. Our mission is to lead the national effort to reduce death injurie and economic loss caused by accidents and health hazards in traffic at work at home and…

—
10
Kawasaki Disease Canada

Promoted health by providing peer support to individuals and family members affected by the disease; advanced education by delivering series of virtual presentations for patients families and professionals focused on our strategic…

—
11
Saskatchewan Crime Stoppers Inc.

The organization receives anonymous telephone calls from anywhere in saskatchewan to a central rcmp location in regina reporting criminal activity. the organization offers rewards for information leading to arrests. they also spend funds…

—
12
Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc.

The foundation obtained it’s registered charity status on may 14 2018. the foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the cancer needs of the people of saskatchewan. as the fundraising partner for the saskatchewan cancer agency the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Societe De L'arthrite Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is 489520 Alberta Ltd.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
27/35
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROSETOWN DISTRICT FOOD BANK — C$29,110 over 8y, 22% of budgetAlex Ositis Foundation — C$21,901 over 8y, 34% of budgetWHEATLAND REGIONAL CENTRE FDN — C$10,682 over 8y, 100% of budgetROSETOWN WHEELS FOR WHEELS — C$9,949 over 8y, 57% of budgetAlzheimer Society of Sask — C$6,254 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCanadian Institute for the Blind — C$4,880 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSalvation Army — C$4,838 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetChildren's Wish Foundation — C$4,763 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$4,234 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSETOWN KID KARE INC — C$4,225 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$4,159 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Mental Health Association — C$4,046 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada — C$3,415 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetArithritus Society — C$2,636 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$2,388 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROSETOWN & DISTRICT HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$1,300 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetROSETOWN & DISTRICT HEALTH CENTRE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHIZOPHRENIA SOCIETY OF SASK. — C$642 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGASPER FAMILY FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRosetown & District Arts Council — C$499 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — C$450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHeomophalia Saskatchewan — C$400 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetINCLUSION SASKATCHEWAN — C$254 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCOUTS CANADA — C$250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROSETOWN UNITED CHURCH — C$200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADA — C$150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL GUIDES OF CANADA — C$150 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUCC CHARITABLE & EDUCATIONAL TRUST — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CENTRAL CRISIS & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC. — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS HEALTH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD FIND INC — C$30 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMADD — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE CANADA — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLung Association of Sask — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL CANADA — C$15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROSETOWN DISTRICT FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Alex Ositis Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WHEATLAND REGIONAL CENTRE FDN ↗
  • Who funds ROSETOWN WHEELS FOR WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Alzheimer Society of Sask ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Institute for the Blind ↗
  • Who funds Salvation Army ↗
  • Who funds Children's Wish Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗
  • Who funds ROSETOWN KID KARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Mental Health Association ↗
  • Who funds Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada ↗
  • Who funds Arithritus Society ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds ROSETOWN & DISTRICT HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROSETOWN & DISTRICT HEALTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds SCHIZOPHRENIA SOCIETY OF SASK. ↗
  • Who funds GASPER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rosetown & District Arts Council ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds Heomophalia Saskatchewan ↗
  • Who funds INCLUSION SASKATCHEWAN ↗
  • Who funds SCOUTS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds ROSETOWN UNITED CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Saskatoon and AreaSK12.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Saskatoon and Area · United Way of Regina · Milden and District Combined Appeal Donors Choice · Eatonia Donors Choice Campaign · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · Saskatoon Community Foundation · Lemberg & District Donors Choice · Elbow & Community Donors Choice Organization · The Maryfield and District Donor's Choice · Tantallon and District Donors Choice Corporation · Biggar and District Donors Choice · Milestone Donors Choice Combined Appeal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-02-28, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 119123743:2024-02-28 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rosetown & District Combined Appeal Donors Choice’s filings →