Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North Buxton, ON · Charitable organization

North Buxton Community Church

Weekly church services providing spiritual direction to members of the church and to the community assistin and having premises available for marriages infant baptisms and funerals giving support to the sick-shut-ins elderly and the needy providing care and maintenance for the church.

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUXTON NATIONAL HISTORIA SITE & MUSEUMC$1,000
CHATHAM HOPE HEAVENC$500
BLENHEIM & MERLIN SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAMC$400
OUR DAILY BREADC$400
CHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGERC$400
CHATHAM GOODFELLOWSC$300
WOMEN'S INTER-CHURCH COUNCIL OF CANADAC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$25k · 18 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

C$25k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-29%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGER
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +99%
  • OD
    OUR DAILY BREAD
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +37%
  • CH
    CHATHAM HOPE HAVEN
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +442%

Funded once

  • NB
    NORTH BUXTON MEMORIAL CEMETARY
    one grant, 2019 · C$735 · revenue -29%
  • GC
    GRACEWALK CANADA
    one grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue -56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Baptist Ministries

Cbm is a global mission organization committed to sharing god's love through word and deed. we believe that god brings healing to a broken world through local churches. with over 150 years of experience we have seen that words and deeds…

—
2
Charis Ministries Int'l Inc

To encourage Christian Faith by ministering to people in Canada and/or across the world and by providing Humanitarian Aid to help alleviate poverty and suffering.

—
3
Christian Aid Ministries of Waterloo

Offer international disaster service for victims of wars natural disasters poverty etc; raise funds to provide medicine clothing housing and financial aid to needy families; bring to the attention of christians in canada the plight of…

—
4
Chatham Kent Hospice Inc.

The organization operates a 10 bed residential hospice program and offers grief and bereavement support in a home-like setting where people in end of life transition and those who love and support them have access to outstanding care.

—
5
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
6
The Rise of Mercy Ministries in Canada
—
7
Refresh Ministries

The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada

—
8
Basic Gospel Canada

Christian radio broadcasts

—
9
Canadian Foodgrains Bank Association Inc/Association De La Banque Canadienne De Grains Inc.

The Canadian Foodgrains Bank is a partnership of Canadian churches and church-based agencies working to end hunger in developing countries. The charitable programs include provision of food to hungry people funding of programs to improve…

—
10
Global Aid Network

To fund facilitate and carry out projects to relieve human suffering (in cases of conflict calamity disaster and poverty) hunger and need and provide developmental aid and assistance both in Canada and worldwide as an extension of the…

—
11
Chatham-Kent Victim Services

Short-term emotional support and practical assistance to the victims of crime tragic circumstances and disaster

—
12
Oms International - Canada

Directs it's programs toward evangelistic ministries establishing local churches and training national pastors and church leaders. examples of additional programs include medical & disaster relief radio literature work teams.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan's Purse - Canada and the most unlike its peers is North Buxton Memorial Cemetery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHATHAM OUTREACH FOR HUNGER — C$3,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD — C$2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM HOPE HAVEN — C$2,450 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM KENT WOMEN CENTRE — C$1,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCB CANADA — C$1,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM GOODFELLOWS — C$1,600 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetFAR EAST BROADCASTING — C$1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITANS PURSE — C$1,360 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Inter-Church Council of Canada — C$1,350 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLENHEIM & MERLIN SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM — C$1,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWATOTO CANADA — C$900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINDSOR DOWNTOWN MISSION — C$800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BUXTON MEMORIAL CEMETARY — C$735 over 1y, 11% of budgetMERLIN UNITED CHURCH — C$500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHATHAM KENT HOSPICE — C$350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRACEWALK CANADA — C$300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew Beginnings — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Chatham…Chatham Kent Communit…Rotary Club of Chatha…Conseil scolaire cath…First Presbyterian Ch…St. James Presbyteria…The Merlin Senior Cit…St Andrew's United Ch…First Christian Refor…St. Clair Catholic Di…Community of ChristUrsuline Religious of…
United Way of Chatham-KentON11.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Chatham-Kent · Chatham Kent Community Foundation · Rotary Club of Chatham Service Fund · Conseil scolaire catholique Providence · First Presbyterian Church · St. James Presbyterian Church · The Merlin Senior Citizens Friendship Club · St Andrew's United Church · First Christian Reformed Church-Chatham-Kent · St. Clair Catholic District School Board · Community of Christ · Ursuline Religious of the Diocese of London in Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 872171301:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on North Buxton Community Church’s filings →