Skip to content

Chatham, ON · Charitable organization

St Andrew's United Church

Weekly Worship Services & Christian Education Programs + Pastoral Care to members adherents and those in need + Benevolent Fund & Other Assistance to those in need + Donations through Denominational Headquarters for Aid/Relief + Donations to local community charities + Faith Invitation Sharing & Hospitality (FISH): Adult Education…

C$312k
Granted FY2024still arriving
244
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 244 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k241 grants · C$265k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$47k
C$520
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$17,730
Individual grant recipientC$15,820
Individual grant recipientC$13,600
Individual grant recipientC$9,385
Individual grant recipientC$7,140
Individual grant recipientC$6,990
Individual grant recipientC$6,692
Individual grant recipientC$6,000
Individual grant recipientC$5,160
. L.A. SHOJI FOUNDATIONC$5,000
A.J. VERHEYC$4,800
Individual grant recipientC$4,350
Individual grant recipientC$4,350
Individual grant recipientC$4,300
Individual grant recipientC$4,300
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 37% of grant dollars (C$188k). The 63% that went abroad (C$314k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 63% of all-years giving (C$314k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$187k · 19 repeat orgsC$315k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 244 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

C$187k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+37%

Still filing today

68%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$312k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CR STUDENT NUTRITION (C/O QUEEN ELIZABEHT II PUBLIC SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$6k · revenue +16%
  • CO
    Chatham Outreach for Hunger
    4× · 2017–2023 · C$6k · revenue +99%
  • KC
    KENESSERIE CAMP
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$4k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • KC
    Kenesserie Camp
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k
  • HF
    Habitat For Humanity, Chatham-Kent
    one grant, 2017 · C$475
  • SC
    Sleeping Children Around The World
    one grant, 2017 · C$420

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatham-Kent Health Alliance

The organization provide a full range of hospital services including 24 hour emergency service.

—
2
Chatham Kent Community Foundation

Funding other charities that provide for community needs. types of charities supported during the year include education health arts & culture recreation social services heritage and the environment

—
3
FreeHelpCK

The purpose of the organization is to help eliminate poverty in the chatham-kent community and provide assistance for everyone regardless of race ethnicity creed gender orientation or background. programs operated by the charity include:…

—
4
Chatham-Kent Community Health Centres

Health promotion programs such as: medical care counselling health promotion diabetes program ect.

—
5
Crime Prevention and Safety Board Chatham-Kent
—
6
Chatham - Kent Health Alliance Helping Hands Auxiliary

The auxilliary operates a retail gift shop in the chatham site of the chatham-kent health alliance. the net proceeds are used to support the community.

—
7
Linck Child Youth & Family Supports Foundation

To maintain funds and apply these funds for charitable purposes for children and youth in chatham-kent.

—
8
Chatham-Kent Victim Services

Short-term emotional support and practical assistance to the victims of crime tragic circumstances and disaster

—
9
Canadian Food for Children (Chatham-Kent)

Revenue used to purchase food clothing school items small toys and tools. volunteers between 12 to 20 three times a week for hours 9 to 12 pack purchased and donated items such as clothes kitchen items medical items candles and personal…

—
10
Chatham Kent Hospice Inc.

The organization operates a 10 bed residential hospice program and offers grief and bereavement support in a home-like setting where people in end of life transition and those who love and support them have access to outstanding care.

—
11
Chatham-Kent Public Education Student Assistnace Foundation

Providing grants and awards to students of the lambton kent district school board

—
12
Chatham-Kent Animal Rescue

Dogs and cats from owner surrenders are placed intially in foster homes and aranged for permanent adoption. dogs and cats from domestic abuse homes are housed in a safe environment and returned when it is safe to do so or put up for…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham Outreach for Hunger Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Pozitive Pathways Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 268 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVICTORIA AVENUE UNITED CHURCH — C$11,600 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCR STUDENT NUTRITION (C/O QUEEN ELIZABEHT II PUBLIC SCHOOL — C$6,340 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetChatham Outreach for Hunger — C$6,314 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKENESSERIE CAMP — C$3,640 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMental Health Network of Chatham-Kent (hope house) — C$3,351 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSALVATION ARMY CHATHAM-KENT — C$2,430 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetChatham-Kent Women's Centre — C$1,598 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUnited Way of Chatham-Kent - Rock Mission — C$1,446 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CK — C$1,275 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEPING CHILDREN AROUND THE WORLD — C$1,260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS SUPPORT (AIDS COMMITEE OF WINDSOR) — C$1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChatham Goodfellows — C$800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCK WOMEN'S CENTRE — C$800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe J.G. Taylor Community Centre Inc. (WISH Centre) — C$400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChatham-Kent Hospice — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VICTORIA AVENUE UNITED CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds CR STUDENT NUTRITION (C/O QUEEN ELIZABEHT II PUBLIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Chatham Outreach for Hunger ↗
  • Who funds KENESSERIE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Network of Chatham-Kent (hope house) ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Chatham-KentON15.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Chatham-Kent · St. Paul's-Victoria Avenue United Church · St. Clair Catholic District School Board · Chatham Kent Community Foundation · Victoria Avenue United Church · First Baptist Church · Ursuline Religious of the Diocese of London in Ontario · St. James Presbyterian Church · Rotary Club of Chatham Service Fund · Calvin Christian School Society Wallaceburg · Sprucedale United Church · First Presbyterian Church

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 268 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119166304:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on St Andrew's United Church’s filings →