Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

Michoel and Sara Goldie Kleiner Charitable Trust

The selection and distribution of funds to qualified donees.

C$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$478k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$2,500
AGUDATH ISRAEL CONGC$2,500
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOLC$2,500
NER ISRAELC$2,500
BOBOV KOLLELC$2,500
TORONTO CHEDERC$2,500
KOLLEL TORONTOC$2,500
YESHIVAH YESODEI HATORAHC$2,500
EITZ CHAIMC$2,500
HACHNOSAS KALLAHC$2,500
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALC$2,500
BAYCREST CENTREC$2,500
BAI YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$1,800
TIFERES BAIS YAAKOVC$1,800
BNOS BAIS YAKOVC$1,800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$239k · 20 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

C$239k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+36%

Still filing today

95%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$35k · revenue +406%
  • HK
    HACHNOSAS KALLAH
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$15k · revenue +105%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$15k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • TK
    TORONTO KOLLEL
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k
  • BC
    BAYCREST CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k
  • KC
    KAYLA CHILDREN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
3
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
4
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
5
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
6
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
7
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
8
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
9
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
10
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
11
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
12
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiferes Bais Yaakov and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Cancer Society - SociÉTÉ Canadienne Du Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$34,893 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHACHNOSAS KALLAH — C$15,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetEITZ CHAIM — C$15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — C$15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOR HAEMET SCHOOL — C$14,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETH JACOB HIHGH SCHOOL — C$13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOBOV KOLLEL — C$13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA OHR CHAIM — C$12,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$11,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO KOLLEL — C$11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNER ISRAEL YESHIVA — C$11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION — C$10,326 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$8,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV — C$5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV — C$5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FUND — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYCREST CENTRE — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — C$2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetYESHIVA NEFESH DOVID — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKAYLA CHILDREN FOUNDATION — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOLLEL DAF YOMI ↗
  • Who funds HACHNOSAS KALLAH ↗
  • Who funds EITZ CHAIM ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds OR HAEMET SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE TORONTO CHEDER ↗
  • Who funds BETH JACOB HIHGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds BOBOV KOLLEL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHR CHAIM ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TORONTO KOLLEL ↗
  • Who funds NER ISRAEL YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION ↗
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BAYCREST CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds NER ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA NEFESH DOVID ↗
  • Who funds KAYLA CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Charity FundON9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Charity Fund · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Messorah Tzedakah Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 705388916:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Michoel and Sara Goldie Kleiner’s filings →