Lethbridge, AB · Charitable organization
McKillop United Church
Worship services were conducted weekly for those attending in-person and also made available on facebook an youtube for those unable to attend or wishing to view at a later time.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$1k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Church of Canada | C$24,968 |
| Chinook Winds Region - The United Church of Canada | C$20,000 |
| Lethbridge Food Bank Society | C$732 |
| Interfaith Food Bank Society of Lethbridge | C$297 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$21k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Church of Canada6× · 2019–2024 · C$189k · revenue +5%
- IFInterfaith Food Bank Society of Lethbridge7× · 2018–2024 · C$6k · revenue +138%
- LSLethbridge Soup Kitchen Association5× · 2019–2023 · C$3k · revenue +408%
Funded once
- LCLethbridge College Student Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$700 · revenue +64%
- SAStreets Alive Family Support Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$500 · revenue +110%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Worship services on sundays as well as sunday school and children's church. operates various study and fellowship groups. charitable service workers program - places charitable service workers in service related community jobs in…
Operation of a humane animal shelter that attempts to find new homes for the pets.
Weekly worship pastoral care & outreach meditation choir; sunday school home & hospital visits funerals weddings christian education bible study
Help mobilize volunteers and community partners in building affordable housing and promoting home-ownership as a means to breaking the cycle of poverty
Provide-support-to-individuals-with-developmental-disabilities-and-to-their-families
Rescue and adoption program for homeless cats
Ongoing community outreach through spiritual retreats and workshops provided by volunteers adn help periodically throughout the year. donations are provided in support of other charitable organizations such as area food banks schools and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Food Bank Society of Lethbridge and the most unlike its peers is Canyon Church Camp Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Church of Canada ↗
- Who funds United Church of Canada ↗
- Who funds Chinook Winds Region - The United Church of Canada ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Food Bank Society of Lethbridge ↗
- Who funds Lethbridge Soup Kitchen Association ↗
- Who funds L'Arche Association of Lethbridge ↗
- Who funds Young Womens Christian Association of Lethbridge & District ↗
- Who funds Canyon Church Camp Association ↗
- Who funds Lethbridge Food Bank Society ↗
- Who funds Lethbridge College Student Association ↗
- Who funds Streets Alive Family Support Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lethbridge Community Foundation · Holy Trinity Ukrainian Greek Orthodox Church · Parish of St Augustine's · Maranatha Christian Reformed Church of Lethbridge · The Holy Spirit Roman Catholic Separate School Division · Atco Electric Epic · Lethbridge 'People of Praise' Society · Lethbridge Mennonite Church · Monarch Reformed Church · Parent/Preschool Program Association of Southwestern Alberta · Evangelical Free Church of Lethbridge · The Christian Reformed Church of Nobleford
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.