Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Private foundation

Maymor Foundation

Receiving and managing funds for the exclusive purpose of making gifts to charities registered under the income tax act

C$164k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$53k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$17k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$94k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$53k
C$1,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KAV SHALOMC$53,350
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$44,000
KOLLEL PAF YOMI USDC$19,175
BETH JACOB HIGHC$10,500
CHEVRA OSEH CHESEPC$10,000
YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAHC$10,000
TORATH ENETHC$4,900
RFROC$2,315
MOSDOS BOBOVC$1,800
COMMUNITY FUNDC$1,500
EMUNAH DAC$1,000
EMZ CHAIMC$1,000
KCCC$860
TORONTO SEPHARDICC$750
KOL TORAHC$504
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$504k · 13 repeat orgsC$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

C$504k
C$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-2%

Still filing today

92%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KAV SHALOM KHM
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$146k · revenue +35%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$132k · revenue +27%
  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$121k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • KT
    KOLLEL TORONTO
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -33%
  • J
    JATHS
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -15%
  • AS
    AGUDAS SHOMREI HADAS
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue ×124

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
3
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
4
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
5
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
6
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
7
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
8
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
9
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
10
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
11
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
12
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
18/38
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKAV SHALOM KHM — C$145,785 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$131,860 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$120,561 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$31,900 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAH — C$26,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHEVRA OSEH CHESEP — C$16,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTORATH EMETH JEWISH CENTRE — C$14,670 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMAZEL CHARITY FUND — C$7,595 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKOLLEL TORONTO — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJATHS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOBOB YESHIVA BNEI TZION (YESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTO) — C$4,960 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA CORPORATION DU CENTRE DES HAUTES ETUDES TALMUD — C$3,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRFRO — C$2,315 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY SHUL — C$2,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI CHILD CARE SERVICES — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FUND — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHATZOLOH TORONTO — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHLAS T2VI — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABOTH-CHEVRAH MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATION — C$1,320 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEGINEI CHANA ASSOCIATION OF TORONTO — C$1,230 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYG25 — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH DA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOL TORAH — C$958 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKCC — C$860 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO SEPHARDIC — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS MISHKAN — C$680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR THE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNHILL TORAH — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEEMAN FON — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI ZION CHARITY FUND — C$460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHW THORNHILL WOODS SHUL — C$360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETIZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack and Doris Bistri…The George Hofstedter…Fieldgate Cares Found…The Gross Family Foun…The Friedberg Charita…Moral Arc FoundationZichron Binyomin Char…The F&R Hauer Charita…The S. Sigler Family …Zolty Charitable Foun…Linas Tzedek Charitab…The Thomas Hofstedter…
Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable FoundationON17.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · The Gross Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · Linas Tzedek Charitable Foundation · The Thomas Hofstedter Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing religion.

Source object 795668805:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Maymor’s filings →