Skip to content

North York, ON · Private foundation

M.D. Foundation

To provide relief of poverty by assisting the poor and for other puposes beneficial to the community.

C$168k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$13k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$75k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$80k
C$4,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$22k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$79,795
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$34,670
BYESC$17,000
YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAC$12,050
ZBCFC$11,173
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOLC$4,000
IATHSC$2,950
KOLLEL TORAS MOSHEC$2,300
CANADIAN FRIENDS & MERKATZ HAKALILIMC$2,000
SSCM FUNDC$1,500
YESHIVA DARCHAI TORAHC$500
YGZSC$180
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$393k · 11 repeat orgsC$13k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

C$393k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$190k · revenue +68%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$59k · revenue +27%
  • B
    BYES
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$36k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AT
    ACHIM TORONTOgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue +52%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR THE EDUCATIO AND WELFARE OF JEWS OF
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -49%
  • TA
    TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF TORONTO MISHKAN HATORAH CHARITABLE TRUgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
3
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
4
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
5
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
7
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
8
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
9
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
10
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—
11
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
12
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Talmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust and the most unlike its peers is Social Services and Communal Matters Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$189,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$58,990 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIATHS — C$49,800 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBYES — C$35,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetZBCF — C$19,547 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA — C$18,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSSCM FUND — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKOLLEL TORAS MOSHE — C$3,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetACHIM TORONTO — C$3,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEP — C$2,860 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR THE EDUCATIO AND WELFARE OF JEWS OF — C$2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARCHEI TORAH — C$2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF TORONTO MISHKAN HATORAH CHARITABLE TRU — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHALACHIC ACADEMY RAAVAD — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHOMREI SHABBOS — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYGZS — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zolty Charitable FoundationON12.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · Abraham Bleeman Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Matan Bsayser Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · My Charity Fund · The Matlow Family Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 760035741:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on M.D.’s filings →