Skip to content
Canadian charities

Kipling, SK · Public foundation

Kipling and District Donors Choice Appeal

Canvas organized information sheets mailed & individuals for drop off or mail in of donations receipts issued.

C$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$517
Median grant
—
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEFC$2,425
RED CROSSC$1,080
PALLIATIVE CAREC$1,041
ALZHEIMER'SC$1,032
HANDI-TRANSITC$1,012
CANCERC$944
FOOD BANKC$891
SWIMMING POOLC$784
HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$697
ARTHRITISC$697
CNIBC$692
HEART AND STROKEC$668
MENTAL HEALTHC$593
DIABETESC$576
KIPLING INDUSTRIESC$551
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$120k · 46 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
9

Total granted

C$120k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-9%

Still filing today

72%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$24 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ALZHEIMER'S
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +51%
  • C
    CNIB
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +25%
  • U
    UNICEF
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • C
    CNIB
    one grant, 2018 · C$681
  • L
    LUNG
    one grant, 2019 · C$527
  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2018 · C$475

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
2
Canadian Myeloma Research Group

In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…

—
3
Hypertension Canada

Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…

—
4
Autism Speaks Canada

Autism Speaks Canada is dedicated to promoting solutions across the spectrum and throughout the lifespan for the needs of individuals with autism and their families by supporting and working with community partners enhancing resources and…

—
5
Canadian Disability Foundation

The Canadian Disability Foundation ('CDF') is Canada’s national disability organization. Established to provide philanthropic support services and innovative social solutions CDF helps the more than 8 million disabled Canadians to be…

—
6
The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

SickKids Foundation has been inspiring our communities since 1972 to invest in improving the lives of children and their families. Donor support is a critical source of funding for the Hospital for Sick Children and in recent years has…

—
7
Fondation Brain Canada / Brain Canada Foundation

Brain canada is a national non-profit organization that enables and supports excellent innovative paradigm-changine brain research in canada. it plays a unique and invaluable role as the national convener of the brain research community.…

—
8
Pancreatic Cancer Canada Cancer du Pancreas Canada

Research: provided continued funding for an early detection study called prosperpanc that aims to identify biomarkers for faster diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as well as a study assessing the current landscape of palliative care in…

—
9
Fighting Blindness Canada

Fighting Blindness Canada leads the fight against blindness by advancing research in to vision loss and blindness education and public awareness. To advance vision research we fund qualified donees researchers and clinicians to investigate…

—
10
Brain Tumour Foundation of Canada

Through the support of donors and volunteers we take action and provide programs for every canadian affected by a brain tumour. we provide information including handbooks storybooks information sheets videos and a comprehensive website and…

—
11
Alzheimer Society of Canada - Societe Alzheimer Du Canada

Assisting provincial Alzheimer Society (AS) organizations to provide information and educational materials to the public; Administering and funding the AS national peer-reviewed research grants and awards program; Creating public awareness…

—
12
Prostate Cancer Canada

Prostate Cancer Canada has continued to responsibly invest the generous donations of Canadians to develop the most promising studies and minds Canada has to offer in the field of prostate cancer research. We have continued to ensure the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Cancer Society - SociÉTÉ Canadienne Du Cancer and the most unlike its peers is Kipling Food Bank Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPALLIATIVE CARE — C$10,213 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S — C$8,492 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRED CROSS — C$7,917 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES — C$5,883 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCNIB — C$5,595 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNICEF — C$4,642 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER — C$4,452 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCancer — C$4,448 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH — C$4,374 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK — C$4,156 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetKIPLING INDUSTRIES — C$4,027 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCARE — C$3,233 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEART AND STROKE — C$3,229 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS — C$2,244 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S — C$2,013 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS — C$1,638 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG — C$1,615 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS — C$1,565 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$1,489 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY — C$1,307 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAbility Fund — C$1,184 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTERRY FOX FOUND. — C$1,182 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetParaplegics — C$1,179 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSTARS — C$946 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLITIS — C$938 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE SOCIETY — C$821 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS — C$648 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME — C$589 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEpilepsy — C$519 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetJuvenile Diabetes — C$485 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAids — C$389 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — C$196 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuntington's — C$178 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBABY'S BREATH — C$149 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKidney Foundation — C$49 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS — C$24 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY — C$24 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds RED CROSS ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES ↗
  • Who funds CNIB ↗
  • Who funds UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds CANCER ↗
  • Who funds Cancer ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KIPLING INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CARE ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND STROKE ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS ↗
  • Who funds LUNG ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ↗
  • Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ↗
  • Who funds Ability Fund ↗
  • Who funds TERRY FOX FOUND. ↗
  • Who funds Paraplegics ↗
  • Who funds STARS ↗
  • Who funds COLITIS ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STARS ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Saskato…United Way of ReginaAbbey and District Co…Carlyle and District …Saskatchewan Communit…The Windthorst and Di…Elbow & Community Don…The Maryfield and Dis…Biggar and District D…Milestone Donors Choi…Churchbridge and Dist…Edam and District Don…
United Way of Saskatoon and AreaSK12.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Saskatoon and Area · United Way of Regina · Abbey and District Combined Appeal · Carlyle and District Donors Choice · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · The Windthorst and District Donor's Choice Appeal · Elbow & Community Donors Choice Organization · The Maryfield and District Donor's Choice · Biggar and District Donors Choice · Milestone Donors Choice Combined Appeal · Churchbridge and District Donors Choice · Edam and District Donors Choice Combined Appeal Committee

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 118982891:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Kipling and District Donors Choice Appeal’s filings →