North York, ON · Charitable organization
K'Hal Toras Chesed
To maintain and conduct a place of worship.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$15k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
- C$50k–250k3 grants · C$195k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU | C$71,788 |
| THE INSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATION | C$66,000 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$56,800 |
| YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA | C$10,800 |
| ACHIM TORONTO | C$9,990 |
| BNOS CHAYA | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TITHE INSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATION6× · 2019–2024 · C$227k · revenue +277%
- YGYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU7× · 2017–2024 · C$148k · revenue +62%
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA4× · 2021–2024 · C$139k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAone grant, 2020 · C$9k
- TCTORONTO CARE FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$4k · revenue +107%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED TALMUDIC AND HALACHIC STUDIESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +81%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.
Operate a school for teaching religious studies
Support of jewish education and institutions
Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Toronto Care Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds ACHIM TORONTO ↗
- Who funds Halachic Acadamy Ravad ↗
- Who funds Beth Oloth ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA ↗
- Who funds BNOS CHAYA ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CARE FUND ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED TALMUDIC AND HALACHIC STUDIES ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE SEMINARY YESHIVAH MIRER OF JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds HACHNOSAS KALLAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Matlow Family Charitable Trust · The S & L Stern Foundation · The M & J Charitable Trust · The Mesora Charitable Foundation · The Dan-Hytman Family Foundation · Ahavas Sholom Charitable Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · The Gross Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · The Daniel and Vera Rubinstein Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.