Bridgetown, NS · Charitable organization
Independent Assemblies of God International Canada
To license and ordain ministers of the gospel to organize and hold regional pastor's meetings.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INSPIRATION MINISTRIES | C$5,194 |
| ARCTIC MISSION OUTREACH TRUST FUND | C$4,400 |
| OPEN WORD MINISTRIES | C$4,200 |
| MISSION THANDO INC | C$4,200 |
| MINISTRY TO RUSSIA & EASTERN EUROPE | C$4,200 |
| LUZ A LAS NACIONES MINISTRIES INC | C$4,200 |
| GRACE LIFE MINISTRIES | C$4,200 |
| CHRIST THE ANSWER INT'L MINISTRIES LTD | C$4,200 |
| INDIA FOR CHRIST | C$4,200 |
| EGLISE VIVANTE DE CHRIST | C$4,200 |
| CANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN CHARITIES | C$1,250 |
| THE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA | C$750 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EVEGLISE VIVANTE DE CHRIST8× · 2017–2024 · C$15k · revenue +60%
- IFINDIA FOR CHRIST8× · 2017–2024 · C$13k · revenue +17% · 31% of their budget
- CTCHRIST THE ANSWER INT'L MINISTRIES LTD5× · 2019–2024 · C$9k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- BEBETH EMMANUAL CHURCH - URBAN HAVEN MINISTRYone grant, 2020 · C$1k
- LTLIGHT TO THE NATIONSone grant, 2021 · C$1k
- TFThe Full Gospel Tabernacle of Cochraneone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
The ministry mission is spreading the propagation of the gospel
Itinerant evangelistic teaching worship and leadership ministry in china japan india & canada
Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done
The vision of Christ Calls Nation is to advance the Christian Faith by preaching teaching and equipping the people with the word of God - the Bible. Prayer is an integral part of the ministry.
Support for church leader orphanage church and bible school in india. ongoing support for a church and orphanage in ukraine building up several ukranian churches spiritually with crusades construction of a church support for a potato farm…
Publishing missionary organizations evangelism social outreach religious fellowship
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christ the Answer International Ministries and the most unlike its peers is The British Methodist Episcopal Church Christ Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARCTIC MISSION OUTREACH TRUST FUND ↗
- Who funds EGLISE VIVANTE DE CHRIST ↗
- Who funds INDIA FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds MISSION THANDO INC ↗
- Who funds MINISTRY TO RUSSIA & EASTERN EUROPE ↗
- Who funds OPEN WORD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LUZ A LAS NACIONES MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST THE ANSWER INT'L MINISTRIES LTD ↗
- Who funds EZRA CANADA ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GRACE LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BETH EMMANUAL CHURCH - URBAN HAVEN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds The Full Gospel Tabernacle of Cochrane ↗
- Who funds PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Celebration Life Ministries · Faith Tabernacle of London · Ebenezer Revival Tabernacle · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.