Scarborough, ON · Charitable organization
Ebenezer Revival Tabernacle
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANT BY WATERS MINISTRIES | C$3,560 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSEMBLIES OF GOD INTERNATIONAL (CAN) | C$2,900 |
| JESUS IN THE CITY | C$2,400 |
| EZRA CANADA | C$1,000 |
| ARCTIC MISSION OUTREACH | C$700 |
| MREE (MINISTRY TO RUSSIA & EASTERN EUROPE) | C$700 |
| OPEN WORD MINISTRIES | C$500 |
| OUR DAILY BREAD | C$250 |
| CHIEF CORNERSTONE TABERNACLE OF PRAISE | C$250 |
| CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHRISTIAN CHARITIES | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IAINDEPENDENT ASSEMBLIES OF GOD INTERNATIONAL8× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue +155%
- FOFESTIVAL OF PRAISE INTERNATIONAL8× · 2017–2024 · C$17k · revenue +23%
- PLPROJECT L.A.M.B.S. INTERNATIONAL4× · 2017–2021 · C$4k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- IHILLUMINATING HIS WORD TO THE NATIONSone grant, 2020 · C$2k
- IMINSPIRATION MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +33%
- OWOPEN WORD MINISTRIESone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church services visitation tract ministry book distribution internet ministry open air preaching feeding the hungry overseas missions evangelism assisting overseas pastors podcasts and internet radio
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Evangelical ministry
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
The ministry mission is spreading the propagation of the gospel
Evangelization
Bible studies prayer meetings
Religious teachings in various locales prayer ministry
Bible and religious teaching mentoring programs study materials seminars and workshops
Missions/evangelism
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Independent Assemblies of God International Canada and the most unlike its peers is Ezra Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANT BY WATERS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT ASSEMBLIES OF GOD INTERNATIONAL (CAN) ↗
- Who funds FESTIVAL OF PRAISE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MREE (MINISTRY TO RUSSIA & EASTERN EUROPE) ↗
- Who funds EZRA CANADA ↗
- Who funds PROJECT L.A.M.B.S. INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Our Daily Bread ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM FAITH DELIVERANCE FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds OPEN WORD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LLOYD W. SHIVRATTAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHRISTIAN CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds THE CHIEF CORNERSTONE TABERNACLE OF PRAISE ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL TRACT PUBLISHERS ↗
- Who funds GRACE GOOD NEWS MISSION ↗
- Who funds House of Faith Tabernacle ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Independent Assemblies of God International Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.