Skip to content

Portage La Prairie, MB · Private foundation

Horizon Charitable Trust

The advancement of religion through the operation of a church and provision of religous instruction.

C$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOUNDARY TRAILS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONC$5,000
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITEEC$5,000
HEART TEAM INC.C$5,000
EDEN FOUNDATIONC$5,000
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF CENTRAL CANADA INC.C$2,000
SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE SERVICE FOUNDATIONC$1,000
LIGHTHOUSE EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION INC.C$1,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSIONC$1,000
CHRISTIAN AID MINISTRIES CANADAC$1,000
SILOAM MISSION INC.C$1,000
NEW HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUSTC$800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$62k · 10 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

C$62k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BOUNDARY TRAILS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$10k · revenue +87%
  • SM
    SILOAM MISSION INC.
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$3k · revenue +29%
  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$2k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • ST
    SHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE SERVICE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · C$1k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eden Health Care Services Inc

Organization provides management and administrative support to a group of companies who provide wrap around mental health services in southern manitoba. the services include a mental health centre residential housing and supports…

—
2
U-Turn Drop in Center Corp.

Support programs for people with addictions and their families

—
3
Addictions Foundation of Manitoba
—
4
Shock Trauma Air Rescue Service

Shock trauma air rescue service (stars) is funded by individual donors service groups corporate donors and government contributions. stars is a network of highly skilled professionals providing rapid and specialized emergency care to…

—
5
Raincity Housing and Support Society

Raincity housing provides innovative specialized housing and support services for people living with mental illness addictions and other challenges. by designing programs based on research assessment evaluation and implementation of best…

—
6
Renascent Foundation Inc.

Renascent Foundation promotes recovery from substance abuse and addiction through public awareness and providing homes for treatment programs. The Foundation raises funds to support substance addiction programs.

—
7
The Healing Oasis Program

Practical services for those affected by trauma crisis addictions and deep loss. individual counseling mental health and teaching ongoing support and advocacy services to those in need

—
8
Hope Returns

Relieves poverty with a special focus on victims of human trafficking

—
9
The Winners Foundation of Canada Inc

Chemical dependency education and counselling in manitoba.

—
10
Mission Services of London Foundation

Mission services of london foundation receives stewards and grants funds to support those experiencing homelessness and those at risk of homelessness through the work of mission services of london branches. through its grants to mission…

—
11
Teen Challenge Canada Inc.

Operate residential drug rehabilitation program for youth across canada print and distribute drug prevention literature provide counselling to parents and youth with addiction related problems

—
12
Transition House Incorporated

Operated short-term support and rehabilitation program for men 16 years of age or more who have an addiction of some sort. mainly dealt with those who are chemically dependent or have gambling problems.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse Evangelistic Association Inc. and the most unlike its peers is New Haven Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEART TEAM INC. — C$15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEDEN FOUNDATION — C$12,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOUNDARY TRAILS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF CNETRAL CANADA INC. — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSILOAM MISSION INC. — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION INC. — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN AID MINISTRIES CANADA — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE SERVICE FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Starlite Charitable TrustMB9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Starlite Charitable Trust · Milltown Charitable Trust · Greenwald Charitable Trust · Sommerfeld Mennonite Church Inc. · Abundance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under christianity.

Source object 764942066:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Horizon’s filings →