Skip to content

Portage La Prairie, MB · Private foundation

Greenwald Charitable Trust

The advancement of education through the operation of a school.

C$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$61k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$11k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$61k
C$800
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN FOOD GRAINS BANKC$60,700
NEW HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUSTC$3,000
HEART TEAM INCC$2,500
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEEC$1,500
EDEN FOUNDATIONC$1,000
INTERLAKE EASTERN HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$800
MANITOBA POSSIBLEC$800
LIGHTHOUSE EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION INCC$300
THE CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETYC$250
MS SOCIETY OF CANADAC$250
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADAC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$45k · 9 repeat orgsC$100k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

C$45k
C$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-6%

Still filing today

89%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$62k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$25k · revenue +42%
  • NH
    NEW HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$7k · revenue +130%
  • LF
    LEGACY FOR LIFE
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$4k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • MC
    MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2022 · C$33k
  • CS
    CRYSTAL SRPING CHARTIABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -15%
  • S
    STARSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paralympic Foundation of Canada

The Paralympic Foundation of Canada's (the 'Foundation') mission is together deliver the best prepared teams for games excellence while promoting inclusive communities through the power of sport and its ambition is to raise $35 Million by…

—
2
Grace General Hospital (Winnipeg) Foundation Inc

The grace hospital foundation supports staff and patient care enhancement that would not otherwise be funded by the government and helps assure that every patient who comes to the grace has access to the best care possible.

—
3
The Children's Hospital Foundation of Manitoba Inc

The main purpose of the foundation is to raise and distribute funds for the advancement of knowledge and care in the fields of child health research as well as to provide equipment and fund programs at the Children's Hospital of Winnipeg.…

—
4
Give Foundation

Give Foundation enables people to make donations to registered Canadian charities in an efficient manner.

—
5
Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

All programs for the Canadian Online Giving Foundation were commenced in 2009. The purpose and mission of the Canadian Online Giving Foundation is to act as a donor advised fund whereby funds are aggregated and distributed to registered…

—
6
McGraw Family Foundation

Provide funds to charitable organizations in canada.

—
7
Red Deer Regional Health Foundation

Red deer regional health foundation (rdrhf) raises and disburses funds for program services and the purchase of medical equipment for the red deer regional hospital centre (rdrhc) and other facilities in alberta health services (ahs)…

—
8
St. Michael's and Providence Foundation

St. michael's foundation stops at nothing to fund the relentless pursuit of solutions to some of the world's toughest health challenges. we mobilize people businesses and foundations to support st. michael's hospital and providence…

—
9
Manitoba Marathon Foundation Inc.

The manitoba marathon foundation inc. raises money to stage annual marathons. funds are raised from runners' pledges entry fees and sponsorship programs. the funds are used to assist people with mental disabilities.

—
10
Amref Health Africa in Canada

Amref health africa in canada ensures access to good health for the most vulnerable and marginalized people in africa. with their active involvement we develop and implement innovative and sustainable solutions to critical health…

—
11
Canadahelps Canadon

CanadaHelps is a charitable foundation working to increase giving in Canada through technology. It provides a safe and trusted one-stop destination for donors to engage with charities in Canada. Donors can donate once monthly or with a…

—
12
Lakeridge Health Foundation

The Lakeridge Health Foundation undertakes various fundraising activities and invests funds the primary purpose of which is to transfer funds to Lakeridge Health (and related community Foundations/Associations) to be used for the purchase…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse Evangelistic Association Inc. and the most unlike its peers is New Haven Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN FOOD GRAINS BANK — C$60,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE — C$24,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLEGACY FOR LIFE — C$3,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEART TEAM INC — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCRYSTAL SRPING CHARTIABLE TRUST — C$2,050 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEDEN FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAGAPE TABLE — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMS SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOBA POSSIBLE — C$800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION INC — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORTAGE EVANGELICAL CHURCH — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOORWAYS ORPHANAGE — C$500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES MANITOBA — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE SALVATION ARMY IN CANADA — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADA POST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wellington West Foundation Inc.MB10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wellington West Foundation Inc. · Cascade Charitable Trust · Starlite Charitable Trust · All Charities Campaign · Horizon Charitable Trust · Milltown Charitable Trust · James Valley Charitable Trust · Silverwinds Charitable Trust · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · The Winnipeg Foundation · Abundance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under christianity.

Source object 891492068:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Greenwald’s filings →