Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Halachic Academy Ravad

Provides research grants for talmudic study; operate an orthodox jewish synagogue

C$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$3k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
C$12,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$858k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$12,500
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$3,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$69k · 3 repeat orgsC$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

C$69k
C$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOML
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$38k · revenue +24%
  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +49%
  • KA
    KOLLEL AVRECHEIM
    2× · 2017–2020 · C$15k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • CB
    CF BETH HILLEL
    one grant, 2023 · C$30k · revenue -18%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERTAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +11%
  • YB
    YEESHIVA BNEI ZION BOBOV
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
3
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
4
Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora

The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith

—
5
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
6
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
7
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
8
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
9
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
10
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
Kolel Yeshivat Kehilat Jacob

To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Chasidei Bobov and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Friends of Yeshiva Beth Hillel Bnai Brak. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL DAF YOML — C$37,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCF BETH HILLEL — C$30,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY — C$15,940 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL AVRECHEIM — C$15,240 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH HERTAGE FOUNDATION — C$10,184 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEESHIVA BNEI ZION BOBOV — C$5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI — C$2,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBabov — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEIS HATAVSHIL AND HACHNOSAS ORCHIM OF TORONTO CHARITABLE FU — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHAREI ZION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA KESSER TORAH — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOL YAKOOV — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chaim Moshe Fried…The M & J Charitable …Heller Family CharityThe Koenig Family Fou…Matan Bsayser Foundat…Jack and Doris Bistri…Moral Arc FoundationMy Charity Fund
The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial FundON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The M & J Charitable Trust · Heller Family Charity · The Koenig Family Foundation · Matan Bsayser Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · My Charity Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 867505984:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Halachic Academy Ravad’s filings →