Huntsville, ON · Private foundation
Gillott Family Trust
Funding of other charities for the advancement of religion and to provide financial assistance to qualified donees and educaitonal institutions
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OMF INTERNATIONAL CANADA | C$1,320 |
| INTERSERVE CANADA/BMMF INTERNATIONAL SERICE FELLOWSHIP | C$1,320 |
| WOOODLAND CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL | C$1,000 |
| FAITH'S ORPHANS FUND | C$1,000 |
| YOUTH UNLIMITED YFC SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO | C$900 |
| CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY | C$800 |
| MUSKOKA BIBLE FOUNDATION | C$563 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -91% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OIOMF INTERNATIONAL CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue +39%
- FOFAITH'S ORPHANS FUND8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +9%
- ICINTERSERVE CANADA/BMMF INTERNATIONAL SERICE FELLOWSHIP7× · 2018–2024 · C$7k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- LLLTM LEADERSHIP TRAINING MINISTRYone grant, 2017 · C$800 · revenue -91%
- WCWOODLAND CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of global scholars canada is to identify develop send equip and support missional christian academics for work primarily in open enrollment post secondary institutions around the world with the objective to inspire and…
To advance Christian Outreach to Asia by teaching the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the Christian faith including by maintaining a Christian Bible School of instruction for missionaries.
Christian University Education
To promote Christian Education world-wide in order to help make disciples of Jesus Christ and to educate the church in North America about cultures by creating opportunities for them to interact to actively participate in meeting people's…
Operates a christian day school and promotes christian education
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
Maintaining funds on behalf of member independent christian schools and their affiliated organizations developing curriculum materials suitible to christian education providing scholarships bursaries and financial assistance.
Development of courses and programs
Bible college for canadian and international students
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bmmf/International Service Fellowship and the most unlike its peers is Faith's Orphans Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OMF INTERNATIONAL CANADA ↗
- Who funds FAITH'S ORPHANS FUND ↗
- Who funds INTERSERVE CANADA/BMMF INTERNATIONAL SERICE FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds MUSKOKA BIBLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WOOODLAND CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds POWER TO CHANGE ↗
- Who funds LTM LEADERSHIP TRAINING MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds KITCHENER-WATERLOO FELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ross-Shire Foundation · D H Falle Family Foundation · Link Charity Canada Inc · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.