Cambridge, ON · Private foundation
Ross-Shire Foundation
Primarily for the purpose of making gifts to 'qualified donees'
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k25 grants · C$136k
- C$10k–50k27 grants · C$534k
- C$50k–250k8 grants · C$724k
- C$250k+2 grants · C$602k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HERITAGE COLLEGE & SEMINARY | C$325,000 |
| SELCARE INTERNATIONAL | C$277,000 |
| SIM CANADA | C$217,000 |
| CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COMM | C$160,000 |
| COPING MINISTRY | C$80,000 |
| ALPHA CANADA | C$60,000 |
| MUSKOKA BIBLE FOUNDATION | C$56,500 |
| OAK HILL ACADEMY | C$50,000 |
| INTER-VARSITY MINISTRIES FOUNDATION | C$50,000 |
| ONTARIO CHRISTIAN GLEANERS | C$50,000 |
| SLAVIC GOSPEL ASSOCIATION | C$44,280 |
| TWR CANADA | C$40,000 |
| CARDUS | C$40,000 |
| FEBC | C$30,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR BIBLICAL PREACHING | C$25,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$368k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HCHeritage College Seminary8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.7M · revenue +51%
- SCSIM CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.7M · revenue +30%
- SISELCARE INTERNATIONAL8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.1M · revenue +60% · 98% of their budget
Funded once
- TITEAM Internationalone grant, 2018 · C$50k · revenue -33%
- HDHAMILTON DISTRICT HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · C$25k · revenue +12%
- ICINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MISSION SERVICESone grant, 2023 · C$25k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
The mission of global scholars canada is to identify develop send equip and support missional christian academics for work primarily in open enrollment post secondary institutions around the world with the objective to inspire and…
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Missionary training -bible studies
To promote Christian Education world-wide in order to help make disciples of Jesus Christ and to educate the church in North America about cultures by creating opportunities for them to interact to actively participate in meeting people's…
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
Christian Reformed World Missions is the international evangelism ministry of the Christian Reformed Church. Activities include evangelism, discipleship, and missions programs around the world.
Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
Our aim is to create God-honouring transformation in communities where He is not worshiped. We prepare and train our workers and volunteers to establish groups of Christ followers in areas where there are presently none both within and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Africa Inland Mission International (Canada) and the most unlike its peers is Media Voice Generation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Heritage College Seminary ↗
- Who funds SIM CANADA ↗
- Who funds SELCARE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CONTEXT WITH LORNA DUECK ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COMM ↗
- Who funds ICVF ↗
- Who funds ALPHA CANADA ↗
- Who funds Slavic Gospel Association ↗
- Who funds MUSKOKA BIBLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWR Canada ↗
- Who funds CARDUS ↗
- Who funds Institute for Biblical Preaching ↗
- Who funds FEBC ↗
- Who funds FAITH ORPANS FUND ↗
- Who funds JAMES NORTH BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds POWER TO CHANGE/CHRISTIAN EMBASSY ↗
- Who funds REDEEMER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Youth Unlimited ↗
- Who funds MAF ↗
- Who funds Send International ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds HARVEST OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds WORLD EMBRACE ↗
- Who funds TRINITY WESTERN ↗
- Who funds ETHOS ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CAPENWRAY HARBOUR ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE FARM ↗
- Who funds GRID ↗
- Who funds MENNONITE COALITION FOR REFUGEE SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds Susek Evangelistic Association ↗
- Who funds Africa Inland Mission Int'l ↗
- Who funds A VISIT WITH MRS. G MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds OMF CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: D H Falle Family Foundation · Christian Stewardship Services · Canadian National Christian Foundation · Bridgeway Foundation · River Dali Foundation · The Foundation Office.Ca · Link Charity Canada Inc · Christian School Foundation (Canada) Inc. · The John & Ellie Voortman Charitable Foundation · Abundance Canada · Hespeler Baptist Church · Forward Baptist Church Cambridge
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.