Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Gagetown, NB · Charitable organization

Gagetown and Area Health Services Association Inc.

Oromocto public hospital foundation

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$731
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$475
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GAGETOWN SCHOOLC$731
CAMBRIDGE NARROWS COMMUNITY SCHOOLC$475
GAGETOWN RECREATION CENTREC$250
OROMOCTO PUBLIC HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$19k · 6 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

C$19k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+32%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    OROMOCTO PUBLIC HOSPITAL FOUNDAITON
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +33%
  • CN
    CAMBRIDGE NARROWS COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$925 · revenue +69%
  • HF
    HOSPICE FREDERICTON
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$400 · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • WL
    WOOLASTOOK LONG TERM CARE FACILITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · C$350 · revenue +19%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$316 · revenue +33%
  • OF
    OROMOCTO FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$200 · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fredericton South Nursing Homeinc

Operation of a nursing home

—
2
Grand Manan Nursing Home Inc.

Nursing home operation

—
3
Roblin Services to Seniors Inc.

Services to seniors (meals and lifeline monitoring)

—
4
Gagetown and Area Health Services Association Inc.

Oromocto public hospital foundation

—
5
Valley Manor Inc.

Operation of a 90 bed nursing home and home for the aged

—
6
Lincourt Manor Inc.

Operation of a nursing home - provide care and rehab

—
7
Tabor Home Inc.

Tabor Home Inc. operates a personal care home and rental of medical equipment not covered by provincial health plans.

—
8
Campbellford Memorial Hospital

Provision of health care services

—
9
Maclean Memorial Hospital - Wauklehegan Manor Foundation Inc.

The wauklehegan manor foundation inc. restricts its donations to capital items (building and equipment) for wauklehegan menor inc. (a nonprofit nursing home) and maclean memorial hospital.

—
10
Hospice of Charlotte Inc.

To provide a home and hospital care program utilizing a physician directed team approach which allows terminally ill patients the opportunity to remain at home with family and friends during their remaining days of life.

—
11
Rexton Lions Nursing Home Incorporated
—
12
Meadow Lake Hospital Foundation Inc.

To raise money by various means to purchase and donate equipment to the meadow lake hospital

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Palliative Care Resource Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cambridge - Narrows Regional Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOROMOCTO PUBLIC HOSPITAL FOUNDAITON — C$5,250 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCAMBRIDGE NARROWS COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$925 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHOSPICE FREDERICTON — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOOLASTOOK LONG TERM CARE FACILITY INC — C$350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — C$316 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE UNITED CHURCH — C$250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOROMOCTO FOOD BANK — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDr. Everett Charles Hospital Foundation — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Samaritan Food Bank — C$100 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way/Centraide …Canada Donates Inc.Brewer FoundationAqueduct FoundationUnited Way East Ontar…My Tribute Gift Found…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way/Centraide (Central N.B./Region Du Centre du N.B.)Inc.NS10.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way/Centraide (Central N.B./Region Du Centre du N.B.)Inc. · Canada Donates Inc. · Brewer Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 890819808:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Gagetown and Area Health Services Association’s filings →