Quebec, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Sylvie Nadeau et Michel Dallaire
1) recevoir et maintenir un fonds ou plusieurs fonds et affecter la totalité ou une partie du capital et le revenu tiré de ce capital de temps en temps à des donataires reconnus selon le définition du paragraphe 149.1(1) de la loi de l'impôt sur le revenu (canada) qui oeuvrent au québec dans le domaine du soulagement de la pauvreté…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$25k
- C$10k–50k9 grants · C$155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION DU COLLEGE FRANCOIS-DE-LAVAL | C$40,000 |
| LE DOMAINE FORGET DE CHARLEVOIX INC. | C$30,000 |
| FONDATION DU MUSÉE DE LA CIVILISATION | C$15,000 |
| LES AMIS DU JUVENAT INC. | C$15,000 |
| CENTRE DE PEDIATRIE SOCIALE DE QUEBEC | C$15,000 |
| FONDATION SIGNES D'ESPOIR | C$10,000 |
| LA FONDATION PORTAGE | C$10,000 |
| LE PATRO ROC-AMADOUR (1978) INC. | C$10,000 |
| FONDATION LE PIOLET | C$10,000 |
| ADAPTAVIE INC. | C$7,200 |
| MAISON POUR FEMMES IMMIGRANTES | C$5,000 |
| LES AMPUTÉS DE GUERRE DU CANADA | C$5,000 |
| LE PIGNON BLEU LA MAISON POUR GRANDIR | C$5,000 |
| FONDATION TEL-JEUNES | C$3,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$70k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LDLE DOMAINE FORGET DE CHARLEVOIX INC.2× · 2023–2024 · C$60k · revenue +11%
- CDCENTRE DE PEDIATRIE SOCIALE DE QUEBEC2× · 2023–2024 · C$25k · revenue +309%
- FFONDATION2× · 2023–2024 · C$20k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- FQFONDATION QUEBECOISE DU CANCER INC.graduatedone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse
Recueillir des fonds afin de promouvoir la compagnie jean duceppe
Contrer la pauvreté par l'éducation
Campagne de financement et souper bénéfice
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Tel-Jeunes and the most unlike its peers is Maison Pour Femmes Immigrantes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION DU COLLEGE FRANCOIS-DE-LAVAL ↗
- Who funds LE DOMAINE FORGET DE CHARLEVOIX INC. ↗
- Who funds LE PATRO ROC-AMADOUR (1978) INC. ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE PEDIATRIE SOCIALE DE QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU MUSÉE DE LA CIVILISATION ↗
- Who funds LES AMIS DU JUVENAT INC. ↗
- Who funds LE PIGNON BLEU LA MAISON POUR GRANDIR ↗
- Who funds LA FONDATION PORTAGE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION SIGNES D'ESPOIR ↗
- Who funds ADAPTAVIE INC. ↗
- Who funds LES AMPUTÉS DE GUERRE DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds MAISON POUR FEMMES IMMIGRANTES ↗
- Who funds FONDATION TEL-JEUNES ↗
- Who funds FONDATION QUEBECOISE DU CANCER INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Frontenac · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Soeurs de Saint-François-D'Assise Du Canada · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Famille Jules Dallaire · Seminaire de Quebec · Fondation Suzanne et Jean-Robert Leclerc · Les religieux de Saint-Vincent de Paul (Canada) · Fondation Ellipse · L'Archevêque catholique romain de Québec
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.