Québec, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Suzanne et Jean-Robert Leclerc
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k19 grants · C$49k
- C$10k–50k12 grants · C$225k
- C$50k–250k9 grants · C$770k
- C$250k+2 grants · C$872k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION DU CHU DE QUÉBEC | C$621,578 |
| LAURA LEMERVEIL | C$250,000 |
| FONDATION STE-THÉRÈSE DE LISIEUX | C$207,000 |
| PATRO LAVAL | C$100,000 |
| LA VICTOIRE DE L'AMOUR | C$100,000 |
| L'AMIE | C$75,000 |
| LE NOEL DU BONHEUR | C$75,000 |
| CAMPUS NOTRE-DAME DE FOY | C$62,500 |
| FONDATION SABSA | C$50,000 |
| FONDATION EN COEUR | C$50,000 |
| SECOURS TIERS-MONDE | C$50,000 |
| FONDATION CATHERINE DE LONGPRÉ | C$30,000 |
| UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL | C$30,000 |
| LA SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DE QUÉBEC | C$25,000 |
| FONDAITON DU COLLÈEGE FRANCOIS DE LAVAL | C$25,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$217k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FDFONDATION DU CHU DE QUÉBEC8× · 2017–2024 · C$2.1M · revenue +2%
- LLLAURA LEMERVEIL5× · 2018–2024 · C$470k · revenue +124%
- PLPATRO LAVAL8× · 2017–2024 · C$400k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- LDL'OEUVRE DES CLERCS DU DIOCESE DE QUÉBECone grant, 2018 · C$51k · revenue -41% · 26% of their budget
- LPLES PETITS FRÈRESone grant, 2021 · C$25k
- SASOCIÉTÉ ALZEIMER DE QUÉBECone grant, 2022 · C$20k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
Dons à des donataires reconnus.
Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.
Recevoir des dons ou legs pour les fins particulières du cmsss d'argenteuil dans le but d'aider d'établissement dans la réalisation de sa mission - organiser des campagnes de souscription et solliciter des dons en faveur du cmsss…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation du Centre de ressources pour les familles militaires Valcartier Valcartier Military Family Resource Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Leeds & Grenville Interval House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION DU CHU DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds AUXILIAIRES FRANCISCAINES ↗
- Who funds LAURA LEMERVEIL ↗
- Who funds PATRO LAVAL ↗
- Who funds FONDATION STE-THÉRÈSE DE LISIEUX ↗
- Who funds FONDATION EN COEUR ↗
- Who funds LA VICTOIRE DE L'AMOUR ↗
- Who funds L'AMIE ↗
- Who funds LE NOEL DU BONHEUR ↗
- Who funds COLLABORATION SANTÉ INTERNATIONALE ↗
- Who funds SECOURS TIERS-MONDE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION IUCPQ ↗
- Who funds Les Charités RSV ↗
- Who funds CAMPUS NOTRE-DAME DE FOY ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CATHERINE DE LONGPRE ↗
- Who funds Fondation St-Francois ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds MISSION CORAIL HAITI QUÉBEC INC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION LE PIOLET ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CEGEP DE LIMOILOU ↗
- Who funds FONDATION GILLES KÈGLE ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL ↗
- Who funds LA MAISON DES JEUNES DE ST- AUGUSTIN- DE- DESMAURES ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CERVO ↗
- Who funds L'OEUVRE DES CLERCS DU DIOCESE DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds MAISON REVIVRE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION SABSA ↗
- Who funds FONDATION MÈRES AU POUVOIR ↗
- Who funds LE VERBE MÉDIAS ↗
- Who funds L'Arche l'etoile ↗
- Who funds LES PETITS FRÈRES ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ ST-VINCENT DE PAUL DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION RÊVES D'ENFANTS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL ↗
- Who funds FONDATION MUSÉE DE LA CIVILISATION ↗
- Who funds LES ENFANTS D'AMOUR ↗
- Who funds FONDAITON CHU STE-JUSTINE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Soeurs de Saint-François-D'Assise Du Canada · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · Les Augustines de la Miséricorde de Jésus du Monastère Saint-Augustin · Fondation Frontenac · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · L'Archevêque catholique romain de Québec · Seminaire de Quebec · Virginia Parker Foundation · Les religieux de Saint-Vincent de Paul (Canada)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.