Verdun, QC · Public foundation
Fondation Père Lindsay
Organisation de concerts-bénéfice afin de receuillir des fonds pour le camps musical de lanaudière offrir des bourses à de jeunes musciens ainsi que de la formation.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$15k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMP MUSICAL PÈRE LINDSAY | C$35,000 |
| FESTIVAL DE LANAUDIÈRE | C$10,000 |
| FONDATION DE LA PLACE DES ARTS | C$10,000 |
| ORCHESTRE MÉTROPOLITAIN | C$5,281 |
| ORFORD MUSIQUE | C$5,000 |
| LE DOMAINE FORGET DE CHARLEVOIX INC. | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CMCAMP MUSICAL PÈRE LINDSAY6× · 2018–2024 · C$202k · revenue +53%
- FDFESTIVAL DE LANAUDIÈRE3× · 2022–2024 · C$31k · revenue +17%
- FDFONDATION DE LA PLACE DES ARTS3× · 2022–2024 · C$30k · revenue +180%
Funded once
- LDL'Académie de musique du Québecone grant, 2017 · C$15k · revenue +17%
- LDL'Académie de musique du Québecone grant, 2018 · C$5k
- OSORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE MONTRÉALgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promouvoir l'excellence dans le domaine de la musique classique en organisant un concours annuel comportant des prix et des bourses fondés pur le mérite et contribuer a l'appréciation des arts par le public en offrant des concerts annuels…
Organiser des manifestations et des concours musicaux à caractère régional national ou international.
Production de concerts de musique classique
Concerts de musique classique concert bénéfice concert de festival
Prix décernés aux lauréats des activités suivantes: la semaine de la musique canadienne festival de musique classique de montréal
Promotion musique de chambre
Concours de musique classique et populaire s'adressant aux jeunes musiciens(nes) de 5 à 21 ans.
Production de concerts de musique classique au palais montcalm à québec
Le concours de musique du québec (cmq) organise annuellement des épreuves régionales et une finale provinciale en association avec le concours de musique du canada (cmc) pour les jeunes musiciens québécois. par un programme déterminé selon…
Proouvoir l'organisation de manifestations artistiques à caractère musical et contribuer de façon directe et indirecte à l'essor de la culture musicale du milieu
Récompenser et encourager l'excellence la créativité et la détermination des artistes de la génération montante. dons à l'orchestre symphonique de québec
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orchestre Symphonique De Montreal/Montreal Symphony Orchestra and the most unlike its peers is Fondation de la Place des Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP MUSICAL PÈRE LINDSAY ↗
- Who funds ORFORD MUSIQUE ↗
- Who funds LE DOMAINE FORGET DE CHARLEVOIX INC. ↗
- Who funds FESTIVAL DE LANAUDIÈRE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE LA PLACE DES ARTS ↗
- Who funds ORCHESTRE MÉTROPOLITAIN ↗
- Who funds L'Académie de musique du Québec ↗
- Who funds C.M.C - CONCOURS DE MUSIQUE DU CANADA INC. ↗
- Who funds Ensemble contemporain de Montréal ↗
- Who funds ORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE MONTRÉAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Fondation Sandra et Alain Bouchard · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Fondation Desjardins · Fondation J.A. Deseve · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Pierre Desmarais Belvedere · Fondation Frontenac · Conseil des arts de Montréal · Fondation J Armand Bombardier
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.