Skip to content

Quebec, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Nordiques

Promouvoir le sport amateur soutenir et promouvoir l'éducation en général le soulagement de la pauvreté dans la région de québec et collecter des fonds pour des fins charitables.

C$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE DES URSULINE DE QUÉBECC$8,500
CORPORATION SPORTS-QUÉBECC$8,250
FONDATION DU CENTRE PSYCHO-PEDAGOGIQUE DE QUÉBEC INC.C$7,500
LAURA LÉMERVEILC$6,000
MAISON LÉMERVEIL SUZANNE VACHONC$5,000
FONDATION DU CENTRE D'HÉBERGEMENT ST-JEAN-EUDESC$1,000
LES VIOLONS DU ROYC$1,000
OEUVRES JEAN LAFRANCE INC.C$804
CLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERSC$500
FONDATION SOURDINEC$500
COQUETÉLIONS INCC$300
FONDATION DES YMCA DU QUÉBECC$300
MAISON DE LAUBERIVIERE AIDE AUX ADULTES EN DIFFICULTÉC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$173k · 12 repeat orgsC$101k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

C$173k
C$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+43%

Still filing today

83%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OJ
    OEUVRES JEAN LAFRANCE INC.
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$121k · revenue +32%
  • LL
    LAURA LÉMERVEIL
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$13k · revenue +27%
  • FS
    FONDATION SOURDINE
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$4k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DU CEGEP BEAUCE-APPALACHES
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue +24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k
  • FD
    FONDATION DU CÉGEP DE SAINTE-FOYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$8k · revenue +149%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
3
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
4
Fondation Collège Laval

Nous appuyons financièrement des enfants provenant de familles éprouvant des difficultés financiéres temporaires ou de longue durée afin d'offrir à un plus grand nombre d'enfants la possibilité de poursuivre leurs études secondaires au…

—
5
Fondation du Collège François-de-Laval

Assistance financière au collège françois-de-laval pour le financement de projets spéciaux comme la rénovation des locaux le renouvellement du parc informatique et la mise à niveau des équipements sportifs

—
6
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
7
Fondation Jonquière-Médic
—
8
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
9
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
10
Fondation: Ecole Saint-Etienne
—
11
Fondation Maurice-Lamarche S J

Chaute- jeunes

—
12
La Fondation Santé
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation pour la protection de la jeunesse de Québec and the most unlike its peers is Movember Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOEUVRES JEAN LAFRANCE INC. — C$121,454 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetLAURA LÉMERVEIL — C$13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DU CEGEP BEAUCE-APPALACHES — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLA FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE DES URSULINE DE QUÉBEC — C$8,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFONDATION DU CÉGEP DE SAINTE-FOY — C$7,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE PSYCHO-PEDAGOGIQUE DE QUÉBEC INC. — C$7,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE JEUNESSE DE QUÉBEC — C$6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINTÉGRATION TSA — C$6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPATRO LAVAL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAISON LÉMERVEIL SUZANNE VACHON — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL — C$4,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES L'ENVOL DE STE-FOY — C$4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFONDATION SAINT-JEAN EUDES — C$4,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetFONDATION SOURDINE — C$3,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION AIRMÉDIC, AMBULANCE AÉRIENNE — C$3,300 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFONDATION HOPITAL JEAN-TALON — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLES VIOLONS DU ROY — C$2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE SOCIAL DE LA CROIX-BLANCHE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION DES YMCA DU QUÉBEC — C$1,154 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DU CANCER — C$1,036 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE D'HÉBERGEMENT ST-JEAN-EUDES — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLES DIABÉTIQUES DE QUÉBEC — C$600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE CARDIOLOGIE ET DE PNEUMOLOGIE... — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERS — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE LEUCÉMIE — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSÉE MARITIME DE CHARLEVOIX — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSÉE DU PANTHEON DES SPORTS DU QUEBEC — C$350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOQUETÉLIONS INC — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEMBER — C$256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DUROCHER — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MÉRICI — C$80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON DE LAUBERIVIERE AIDE AUX ADULTES EN DIFFICULTÉ — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Québec PhilanthropeQC20× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Desjardins · Garaga: Un rayon de soleil Garaga: A ray of sunshine · Virginia Parker Foundation · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · Soeurs de Saint-François-D'Assise Du Canada · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · Fondation Saison Nouvelle · Fondation Suzanne et Jean-Robert Leclerc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 894942952:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Nordiques’ filings →