Skip to content

Sherbrooke, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Justin Lefebvre

Soulager la pauvreté en diminuant les obstacles financiers pour les enfants venant de familles à faible revenu afin de leur donner accès à des activités sportives et à l'éducation.

C$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$31k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$11k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$31k
C$3,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION COMMISSION SCOLAIRE DE SHERBROOKEC$31,200
FONDATION MB CAPITALC$4,950
MAISON DE LA FAMILLE LES ARBRISSEAUXC$3,000
FONDATION DU TRIOLETC$2,500
FONDATION CHRISTIAN VACHONC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$318k · 6 repeat orgsC$368k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

C$318k
C$363k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-4%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$200k · revenue +34%
  • FP
    FONDATION POUR LES ÉLÈVES DE LA CSRS
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$79k · revenue +2%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU TRIOLET
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$17k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DU CHUS
    one grant, 2023 · C$300k · revenue -4%
  • NP
    NOUVEAU PARCOURS ORGANISME DE SOUTIEN AUX JEUNES
    one grant, 2019 · C$23k · revenue -89%
  • FA
    FONDATION AMÉLIA ET LINO SAPUTO JR
    one grant, 2018 · C$18k · revenue -6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation: Ecole Saint-Etienne
—
2
Fondation Cégep de Sherbrooke

Aide au étudiants en difficulté concours scientifiques soutien stages à l'étranger

—
3
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
4
La Fondation De L'ecole Paul-Bruchesi De Montreal
—
5
Le Fond De Developpement Du College Jean-De-Brebeuf
—
6
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
7
Fondation Ecole Marcelle-Mallet

Remise de bourses d'étude pour les élèves financierement défavorisés féquentant l'école marcelle-mallet.

—
8
Fondation De L'ecole Secondaire Jean-Nicolet

Achats de matériel et récompenses pour les élèves de notre école

—
9
Fondation De L'ecole Du Meandre
—
10
Fondation de l'école secondaire Saint-Joseph
—
11
Fondation de l'Ecole de la Sablière

Recueillir des fonds destinés à l'achat de biens et services à caractère éducatif pour les étudiants de l'école de la sablière du centre de service scolaire des affluents.

—
12
Fondation De L'ecole Secondaire De Mortagne
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du Séminaire de Sherbrooke and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Mb Capital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DU CHUS — C$300,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE — C$200,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION POUR LES ÉLÈVES DE LA CSRS — C$78,600 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetNOUVEAU PARCOURS ORGANISME DE SOUTIEN AUX JEUNES — C$23,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFONDATION AMÉLIA ET LINO SAPUTO JR — C$17,533 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFONDATION DU TRIOLET — C$16,900 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE LES ARBRISSEAUX — C$15,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetFONDATION SÉMINAIRE DE SHERBROOKE — C$7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLA FONDATION LE PHARE INC. — C$5,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFONDATION MB CAPITAL — C$4,950 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBISHOP'S UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION LES AMIS DE L'ÉCOLE JEAN XXII — C$2,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetCORPORATION DES AMIS ÉCOLE BOISJOLI — C$2,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFONDATION JEUNESSE DE LA COTE-SUD — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION CHRISTIAN VACHON — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION LES AMIS DE L'ÉCOLE ST-ANNE — C$1,500 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSOUTIEN AUX FAMILLES RÉFUGIÉS ET IMMIGRANTES DE L'ESTRIE — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATION SPORTIVE DES JEUNES HANDICAPÉS DE L'ESTRIE — C$1,050 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLA FONDATION LE PHARE INC. — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke)QC12.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke) · Fondation Familles Lauzon Et Provencher · Conam Charitable Foundation · Universite de Sherbrooke · Fondation Défi Everest · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Wcpd Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 770533685:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Justin Lefebvre’s filings →