Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Sherbrooke, QC · Charitable organization

Universite de Sherbrooke

Enseignement supérieur et recherche

C$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k15 grants · C$24k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$45k
C$800
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKEC$45,075
TECHNOSCIENCES ESTRIEC$8,750
SHERBROOKE VILE EN SANTÉC$5,300
FONDATION DE L'ORDRE DES INFIRMIÈRES ET INFIRMIERS DU QUÉBECC$2,300
FONDATION POUT LES ÉLÈVES DE LA CSRSC$1,750
FONDATION FORCEC$1,350
ACFACC$800
ORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE SHERBROOKEC$800
FONDATION DU CÉGEP DE SHERBROOKEC$700
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERC$500
FONDATION EDOUARD MONTPETITC$500
LA SOUPE POPULAIRE DE CHICOUTIMIC$300
MUSÉE DES BEAUX ARTS DE SHERBROOKEC$270
FONDATION DU ZOO DE GRANBYC$250
FONDATION DE LA RECHERCHE PÉDIATRIQUEC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$159k · 32 repeat orgsC$59k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
53

Total granted

C$159k
C$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$71k · revenue +106%
  • SP
    SOCIÉTÉ POUR LES ENFANTS HANDICAPÉS DU QUÉBEC
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$14k · revenue +47%
  • TE
    TECHNOSCIENCES ESTRIE
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$12k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN
    one grant, 2021 · C$15k · revenue +23%
  • FA
    FORCE AVENIR
    one grant, 2022 · C$9k · revenue +1%
  • IQ
    INSTITUT QUÉBÉCOIS DE RÉFORME DU DROIT ET DE LA JUSTICE
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
3
La Fondation Santé
—
4
Fondation Marie-Vincent

Centre d'expertise marie vincent chaire de recherche interuniversitaire marie vincent

—
5
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
6
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
7
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
8
Fondation Santé de la Rouge

Le mandat de la fondation santé de la rouge est de développer avec la communauté des hautes-laurentides un partenariat qui lui permetta d'apporter aux intervenants les outils nécessaires pour offrir à la population de meilleurs soins…

—
9
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
10
Fondation SantÉ De L'archipel

Soutenir financièrement les acquisitions d'équipements médicaux à la fine pointe de la technoligie de la sécurié du confort en faveur du centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des îles.

—
11
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
12
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation SantÉ Haut-Richelieu-Rouville and the most unlike its peers is Croquarium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/87
Grantees still filing
75/87
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE — C$71,075 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ POUR LES ENFANTS HANDICAPÉS DU QUÉBEC — C$14,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTECHNOSCIENCES ESTRIE — C$11,650 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSHERBROOKE VILE EN SANTÉ — C$10,950 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetFORCE AVENIR — C$9,015 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROUPE DE COLLABOTATION INTERNATIONALE EN INGÉNIERIE — C$8,300 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetCANADIAN ENGINEERING MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — C$6,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFONDATION FORCE — C$5,290 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUT QUÉBÉCOIS DE RÉFORME DU DROIT ET DE LA JUSTICE — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE CARDIOLOGIE ET DE PNEUMONIE DE QUÉ — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetF.R.A.U.S — C$3,800 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFondation du CHUS — C$3,070 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE SHERBROOKE — C$2,835 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN MEDICAL HALL OF FAME — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ORDRE DES INFIRMIÈRES ET INFIRMIERS DU QUÉBEC — C$2,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACFAC — C$2,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CÉGEP ÉDOUARD MONTPETIT — C$2,001 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHÉÂTRE DE LA VILLE — C$1,890 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION POUT LES ÉLÈVES DE LA CSRS — C$1,820 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION JUSTIN LEFEBVRE — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFondation de l'Hôpital régional Chaleur — C$1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSociété canadienne du cancer — C$1,210 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL MAISSONNEUVE-ROSEMONT — C$1,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON CALM — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDS DE DOTATION SANTÉ JONQUIERE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON ESTRIE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLEUCAN — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUQAM — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIS ESTRIE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUN'ACTION STE-JEANNE D'ARC INC. — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetASSOCIATION DU SYNDROME DE DOWN — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION PRICE ALBERT II DE MONACO — C$930 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMAISON AUBE LUMIÈRE — C$780 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CÉGEP DE SHERBROOKE — C$775 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION HÔPITAL CHARLES- LEMOYNE — C$750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROQUARIUM — C$715 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEVI CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DU CANCER — C$565 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE D'INTERVENTION EN VIOLENCE & ABUS SEXUELS DE L'EXTRIE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA MAISON DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DU SAGUENAY — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDI APTE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE CORPS ÂME ET ESPRIT — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISON MONDIALE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTDA/H ESTRIE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION DES PERSONNES APHASIQUES DE SAGUENAY — C$500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFONDATION CANADIENNE DU REIN — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHÉMA-QUÉBEC — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Estrie (Con…Fondation canadienne …Soeurs Missionnaires …Fondation DesjardinsFondation J Armand Bo…Oeuvres Regis-VernetFondation Famille God…Soeurs de la Presenta…Les Petites Soeurs de…Fondation Défi EverestL'Abbaye de Saint-Ben…Les Clarisses de Sher…
Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke)QC23× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke) · Fondation canadienne FCSCJ · Soeurs Missionnaires de Notre-Dame Des Anges · Fondation Desjardins · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Soeurs de la Presentation de Marie Du Quebec · Les Petites Soeurs de la Sainte-Famille · Fondation Défi Everest · L'Abbaye de Saint-Benoit-Du-Lac · Les Clarisses de Sherbrooke

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 108161076:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Universite de Sherbrooke’s filings →