Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Public foundation

Fondation Des Instituts Juifs Orthodoxes

Societe philantropique a but non lucratif.

C$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$85k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$3k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$85k
C$11,400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$298k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND RABBINAT SEPHARADE DU QUEBECC$85,051
VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$11,400
MAHARAM TAV FUNDC$2,910
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$488k · 3 repeat orgsC$152k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

C$488k
C$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GRAND RABBINAT SEPHARADU DU QUEBEC
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$327k · revenue +77%
  • VM
    Vaad Mishmeres Mitzvos
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$130k
  • VZ
    VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$32k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • VM
    VAAD MISHMERES MITZVOS
    one grant, 2019 · C$66k
  • V
    VMM
    one grant, 2020 · C$43k
  • CT
    Chasdei Tovim Meoros
    one grant, 2017 · C$12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
3
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
4
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
5
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
6
Institut Gueder Chel Torah

Promouvoir l'étude de torah et la formation des futurs dirigeants religieux supporter la pratique les besoins religieux culturelles et traditionnelles de la communauté juive assistance pour les nécessiteux dans la communauté juive

—
7
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
8
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
9
École juive sepharadic/the sepharadic cheder

Soutien et rapprochement de la jeunesse a la religion juive

—
10
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
11
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
12
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College Beth Jacob Pour Les Enseignants Inc and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRAND RABBINAT SEPHARADU DU QUEBEC — C$326,918 over 5y, 16% of budgetVMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$31,580 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAVNE — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCentre Chabad — C$5,472 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$2,910 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunaute Sepgarade Beth Rambam — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBETH JACOB — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI CENTER — C$1,880 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION EI HASHORESH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetECOLE BETH JACOB — C$900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLE TALMUDIQUES BETH YOSEF MEIR — C$310 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Rayjo Charitable TrustFondation de la Famil…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Congregation de L'Aid…Fondation Miryam Berd…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Federation CjaThe Friedman Family F…Aaron and Susan Liebe…Fondation Familiale G…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC11.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Fondation de la Famille Nataf/Nataf Family Foundation · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Federation Cja · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-02-28, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under support of religion.

Source object 898255591:2024-02-28 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Des Instituts Juifs Orthodoxes’ filings →